• Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    199
    ·
    3 months ago

    School choice activist Corey DeAngelis participated in a GayHoopla adult film called “Super Star Compilation! How Many Strokes Til You Cum?!” before writing his book, The Parent Revolution: Rescuing Your Kids from the Radicals Ruining Our Schools.

    Are we sure this isn’t The Onion?

    • otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is the same timeline that fails (refuses?) to recognize the dystopian overlap of 1984, Fahrenheit 451, Idiocracy, Margaret Atwood, … and its own blithely un-ironic trajectory, right?

    • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s always projection. Every fucking time.

      I don’t want to accuse the GOP of pedophilia, but so many of their accusations have been admissions that it disgusting to even contemplate.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s so strange that these types of people choose the GOP, because I don’t think most Democrats give a shit about this. It’s definitely just them taking on a strong form of projection…

      It’s sad. These people are just sad people running away from things their “friends” told them are evil. So they then become “the friends” to others. And here we have sad circle of GOP life. Sad people making other people sad.

  • cybervseas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Why do they have to be this way? What happened to these Republicans? Are they genuinely held beliefs or is it all just opportunism?

    ETA: does it matter? 🙁

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I’m not a psychologist but there has to be some deep-seated self-loathing from repressing their true sexuality/identity for decades. Or maybe they subconsciously feel “if I can’t be who I want to be, you can’t either.”

      • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I am a Psychologist. They gain status from being assholes, because enough people privilege assholes with status. Authoritarianism requires an outgroup to oppress, and people think that hostility and oppression is ‘strength’. The original theory (which is not entirely supported by evidence) of the Authoritarian Personality is based on Freud, and it says that a similar family dynamic of a powerful father who arbitrarily abuses and oppresses others is the basis.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authoritarian_personality

        • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          yeah I was talking about the people who also display LGBTQ behavior, not just your run of the mill republican.

      • JTskulk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’ve got a theory on this: They have gay urges and therefor think everyone has them, so they believe that everyone needs to “choose to be straight” and it’s just weak sinners who are giving into their urges.

        Also to grandparent: it’s allllllll projection with conservatives.

        • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Not every repressed gay person is a cunt. Not every cunt is a repressed gay person.

          But some of these aggresively anti-LGBT+ cunts sure look like they’re in the intersection.

          Edit: IDK if the phrasing “repressed gay” works in English? If it’s wrong, let me know

          • TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Repressed gay works just fine tbh, most people probably use “closeted” but that’s more colloquial.

            However, referring to a gay person as a “gay” can be a bit problematic as it strips their personhood from the statement. A lot of bigots will refer to gay people that way to imply they are lesser. I dunno if that’s how it works in other languages, but at least in English it’s generally more respectful to refer to groups as people specifically. So you’d always say “gay people” or “black people” and etc.

            • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              Fixed that then. I chose repressed over closeted, as I feel it emphasises the point that they’re pushing themselves deeper into the closet, but maybe that’s a linguistic nuance I’m misunderstanding.

        • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          There is a fair amount of speculation that being bi is actually way more common than is generally thought but because current cultural rules of compulsory heterosexuallity codes being bi as being something you must act on to actually be considered that identity a lot of people believe that they are straight simply because they never acted on the attraction.

          For guys the comp-het mindset also tends to discount basically any situation where they feel dominant because “straight” and “masculine” to them basically means that as long as they are the petetrative element in a place of absolute control via power dynamics or violence then it doesn’t count as “gay”. Essentially since as long as it holds no emotional attachment to them it doesn’t count. As long as they can’t code their behaviour as “feminine” it doesn’t count.

          Which to the rest of us is fucking bonkers…

    • Artyom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Self-contradiction is inherent to fascism and exclusionism. It is a feature, not a problem. It demonstrates that if you are something the fascists hate, you are immune from punishment if you simply support their cause. The more you support them, the more immune you are. Trump is immune from any criticism, whether it be adultery, rape, bigotry, stupidity, etc. The lower you are, the more you have to earn your protection in case they take control. This is their most important tool in recruitment, whether they understand it or not.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    3 months ago

    She also questioned how the video of her dancing at a club would be released before videos of Sean “Diddy” Combs and Jeffrey Epstein – both of whom prosecutors allege engaged in sex acts with minors – are released to the public.

    Because you were at a public party, you dumb fuck.

  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think you mean, “Drag queens caught partying with GOP candidate who called them pedophiles.”

    • kevindqc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Do drag queens know everyone who comes at the club/venue they’re performing?

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The point of the comment wasn’t to blame the drag queens. It was to reverse the implicit shame of being, “caught,” that’s in the title, giving the connotation that it’s shameful or embarrassing to associate with the GOP candidate, not the other way around. It was just a little quip that I’m sure I’ve made much funnier with this explanation.

          • pjwestin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Well, take that, established rules of comedy!

            …The previous sentence was a reference to common idiom, “If you have to explain the joke, then it’s not funny,” while the current sentence is an example of irony. Here, I am not using irony as it’s colloquially used, which could best be described as a funny coincidence, but rather by its literally definition of, “the use of words expressing something other than their literal intention.” While the literal intention of my words is an explanation of my first and second sentences, the non-literal intention is a continuation of the premise that I am over-explaining my own jokes, thereby using irony to create what some would call a, “meta,” joke.

  • Cpo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 months ago

    Imagine being so young and having so much hate in you.

    I pity that woman.

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nah, she deserves every single ounce of hate and pain that gets delivered to her.

  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Knowing how much the Gaggle Of Pedophiles likes to project, maybe she showed up expecting something at that party.

  • VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I love how she said she gets along with everyone and still went on to say that it’s “impossible to walk around New York City without running into a mentally ill fa***t.” Like, who do you think you’re referring to with that statement? Because it seems to me she’s referring to the drag queen she “gets along with.” At least the hypocrisy remains consistent.

    • EABOD25@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      drag queens have a right to… drag? personal life doesn’t impact professional life or affect any parties not involved. People should be able to find their happiness in this fucked up world.

      And to be more clear. I’m criticizing people who have let their upbringing convince them that something that is none of their business somehow impacts their personal life

      • VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Absolutely, it’s also completely ridiculous that she seems to recognize that drag can be fun and chill, yet continues to double down on the phobia.

      • MuhammadJesusGaySex@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It shouldn’t, but the reality is that it does. When someone has a bad day and Karens out, maybe says some especially heinous stuff, maybe says some racist stuff. They usually aren’t at work. They are usually fine at doing their jobs but quite a few people have been fired over stuff like that. That is definitely personal life affecting professional life.

        I could keep going, but the reality is that it has become quite acceptable these days to get in professional hot water for what you do when you aren’t on the clock.

        Hell, even drug tests at work are usually getting punished in your professional life for your personal life.

        • EABOD25@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Yeah. I might have misspoke in that regard. What my ultimate opinion is that if your personal life isn’t impacted by what stranger’s do, then you have no position to properly speak on it

  • recapitated@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 months ago

    Interesting that GOP will list things that they are opposed to and then go and do them. We better make sure this dude isn’t a pedo.

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Another example of people thinking they can’t be who they really are, so choose to hate the ones who can.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    This nazi shithead should get hers for terrorist statements. I hope that happens. Fuck this hypocrite

  • kemsat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    So, does that mean she’s a pedophile? At least according to himself?

    Edit: didn’t read, assumed it had been a dude