It’s the color of their paper:
When the FT started out, newspapers were black and white. But in 1893 – five years after the FT was founded – we began to publish the paper in a light salmon colour, to stand apart from competitors on the newsstand, and reduce costs by using unbleached recycled paper.
I didn’t defend anybody. You don’t get to put words in my mouth like that.
Whoa that escalated quickly, and is entirely not about what I was saying.
I understand that it merits discussion but every thread on this post is about that aspect, and that’s frankly a bit much.
I’m not one to pointlessly gender things, but in this case I feel it matters a lot.
His point is that is not what the article is about. It’s off-topic.
I get that you’re passionate about getting your point across but it’s swamping the discussion a bit.
There’s Meloni and Wilders, unfortunately. But yes please depose the bastard
Yes I know, that’s why it’s so weird. In what way does that work?
If you suggested rubbing it in, at least the vector would be clear to me.
It’s there any paper in this, or is it purely anecdotal?
That eye floater bit sounds sketchy af
I was expecting the undertaker throwing mankind
Every election and referendum that is important in Europe has Russian meddling.
You kid, but there was a real battle flag of France, the Oriflamme and from 1643 the flag of France was really white, albeit with fleurs de lis all over it.
Furthermore the French army, historically got far more wins than capitulations. The meme of surrendering being based on the second world war.
Twas thnx
Thanks for sharing your story!
I like to think that he forgets, keeps trying and then makes a new post about it
Hey, what’s up?
Well my schnauzer just went to the first floor. So I guess the dog is up.
Little Scandinavian band called Kashmir, mommy in love, daddy in space
Quatro Stagoni
Not insignificantly due to misinformation. Like Brexit.
No because the writer(s) are clearly on drugs. At least that’s the only way to explain that shit.