The common MO amongst right wingers is they claim that dissidents like Mahmoud Khalil is a “guest” and therefore they believe that he should not have the right to criticize the government.

What is your view on this?

Edit: Mr. Khalil has a Green Card btw, just to clarify.

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    10 days ago

    Right wingers don’t stop with immigrants. “Love it or leave it” applies to everyone as far as they’re concerned.

    • aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 days ago

      Unless a Democrat is in office, in which case everything the government does is the most disastrous, evil, horrible thing to ever exist.

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    10 days ago

    A government that can’t stand up to simple criticism is a weak government.

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 days ago

    Everybody has a right to criticize anything they want.

    I don’t have to visit the Sahara to know that it’s hot and dry there, and there’s no reason I shouldn’t be able to say it’s too hot and dry for me to want to go there.

    Someone else might criticize the Sahara for being too cold and wet. That doesn’t make any sense to me, and I can claim that they don’t know what they are talking about, but they have the right to believe that.

  • DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    If there is something to criticize, everyone should do so. Criticism is a good thing: you don’t necessarily have to share it, but you can learn from it.

  • Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 days ago

    If we’re talking about the USA specifically, then the answer is yes. The Bill of Rights applies to everyone.

    • NABDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Well, it was yes.

      What we’re all seeing now is that the Constitution ultimately depends on our willingness to agree to collectively abide by it.

      It was always just a story, but while we all agreed to believe in it, it was a true story.

  • the_abecedarian@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 days ago

    It’s just an excuse. They want to get rid of him because they don’t like his politics and he’s an activist. Whether the state categorizes you as a citizen, resident, tourist, undocumented, etc. should have nothing to do with your right to speak out.

  • Ziggurat@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 days ago

    Anyone has the right to criticise any government. Tons of Lemmy thread on !world@lemmy.world are basically foreigner giving negative (and sometimes positive) critics about government with sometimes locals giving contexts

    If you can criticise dictatorship like Russia, North Korea you can also criticise democracies like US or France. Even better, in these countries, you can legally do it from national soil, while in dictatorship you’d get into trouble

  • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Are you asking if humans have the right to free speech? Because yes.

    Any “government” that doesn’t recognize that deserves the respect of no human being

  • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Green card holders are permanent. They’re not any form of temporary and are absolutely not guests.

    When you are a guest, yes, follow local customs.

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    That depends on if we consider Thomas Paine a founding father or a criminal speaker.

    Free speech means you can speak freely

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Free free speech hasn’t existed in the US for a long, long time.

      Sure you can quip jokes, sure you can call names, you can protest a little bit here and there.

      But try being a student and protest, it may actually get you killed or deported or just disappeared.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        You say that but I was a student protestor a decade ago and it wasn’t this bad. And regardless just because our government is violating the law and our nation’s fundamental ideology (liberty and democracy) and has been for some time doesn’t mean we shouldn’t call them out on it

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 days ago

    Should doesn’t enter. They do have that right, it’s a human right, the right of free expression. Doesn’t depend on nationality or location, only humanity.

  • CubitOom@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 days ago

    If freedom of speech is granted to all and there is legal precedent and long standing tradition for that case then all should be able to have freedom of speech regardless of status.

    • wagesj45@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      I would expand on this to declare that the free speech that has been granted to all is a Good Thing™ and should be a point of pride that we strive for and boldly implement.

  • InfiniteHench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 days ago

    Pragmatically: It depends on the country’s laws for free speech and criticism, your location, and a country’s extradition relationship.

    Personally: Yes, we should all have the right to criticize our own and others’ governments. But we should also take the responsibility and initiative to get educated while doing so.