I bet those bounce and shake nicely
I bet those bounce and shake nicely
Yes but he serves a different community
It began with the forging of the Great Rings.
Three were given to the Elves; immortal, wisest and fairest of all beings.
Seven to the Dwarf Lords, great miners and craftsmen of the mountain halls.
And nine…Nine rings were gifted to the Race of Men, who above all else desire power.
For within these rings was bound the strength and will to govern each race.
But do you recall… The most famous one ring of all
But for who? Just him?
Probably for the same reason we haven’t here.
I’m not sure what that reason is but if I were to venture a guess it’s that the instance isn’t necessarily an issue, just a lot of the users that like to brigade and/or start shit
Against my better judgement, why not.
If you’re acting in good faith why did you not answer when I asked if you understood how our elections work?
If you’re acting in good faith where did I state you were an elector?
If you’re acting in good faith why are you badgering with a question that you already know the answer to?
No. You are not “literally just asking you to explain your own understanding of presidential elections” and you know it. You refuse to participate in the discussion in favor of your own, possibly with the intent of seeking some kind of so-called gotcha moment. It’s not coming. They’re are functionally two parties within our presidential elections.
Since 1900 a third party candidate has received more than 5% of the popular vote (that’s you and me) roughly 6 times. That number drops to about 4 if you want more than 10%. In that same time a third party candidate has received any votes from electors (which are outdated but still very much the ones who are counted thus important to the process as it exists) in 6 elections. The last one was in 1972.
And just to further reinforce, that’s any votes from electors. The highest in that time was in 1912 when Theodore Roosevelt received 88. George Wallace later got 46 in 1968 and Strom Thurmond managed 39 in 1948. They continue downward from there.
So no, as you’ve been told by others, a third party candidate is generally not electable in the system we have. This is why the system is often called a two party system despite the existence of third parties. You’ll notice in common parlance they’re not counted, they’re called third parties. This is not a controversial opinion I hold, it’s how it is widely discussed by laymen and experts alike.
But you already knew all that and instead chose to badger to try and, I can only assume, have some kind of moment or way you were right. You were acting in bad faith and I have no more time or energy for your type of “discussion”. Goodbye.
Because they’re an instrumental part of how the election process works for quite a while now. If a candidate is receiving 0 electoral votes they are functionally as electable as you or I.
You’ve more than proven yourself to be in bad faith here though, so you’ll have to pester someone else with future efforts.
I assumed you understood how a presidential election worked in the US. Was I mistaken?
How many presidential elections have you participated in where more than two parties received any electoral votes at all?
They are in a two party system
No, but I’m gonna run his code anyway
Or even just a board game night.
Maybe it just means boring guys. Drinking is a secondary activity, not a primary one.
The given answers, and so they can act like there wasn’t that much of what happened.
No one can watch all that, so they’ll claim that violence is cherry picked and it’s the mostly peaceful protest they’ve been claiming the whole time.
It’s still a lie but it’s one they’re giving “evidence” to their supporters for.
Yes, that’s nuts. I used to be very happy to have less than one and a half megs on something wider than a deck of cards. Now you’re talking about terabytes on something the size of a pinky fingernail. I could store a half dozen in a pocket in my wallet without noticing them. That’s a lot of storage.
For the record, only 6-10 games is also about 5-10 games more than I could store on one of those floppies, and if it was one it was an old game. It’d be akin to putting Halo: CE (not remastered or anything, original) on a micro SD.
So, yeah, storage is plentiful and readily available.
Nah, portable devices use portable storage. The space available in microSD is nuts
And readily available resources. No need to put effort into space saving tricks when space is so easy to come by
That dress could stand to go a little lower
I’m not convinced they will regardless, but you have a point
Pretty sure that’s the fog that turns you inside out
Which is Treehouse of horror… 5?
Of course we did they look great