• Mrkawfee@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    The lawmaker, who has previously been labelled a Dutch version of Donald Trump, will have to form a coalition government before he can take the reins of power.

    And here we see evidence of why proportional voting systems provide a defence against populists and authoritarians by moderating extremes. Wilders is softening his xenophobic rhetoric in order to facilitate compromise. If the UK had PR, Brexit would never have happened.

    • Ummdustry@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago
      • Paul Von hidenburg, Jan 1933

      I mean, I do agree PR is better than FPTP, just for different reasons. Brexit is bad sure, but I’m not sure I’d want UKIP to have >12% of seats in parliament either.

      • thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m a salty remainer who detests Farage but there’s something deeply undemocratic when a party can get 10-15% of the vote and achieve no elected parliamentary representation, while the Tories get an unassailable majority with 34% of the vote

        I’ll put up with some Farage-ist mouth breathers in westminster if we actually got some democracy in return

        • Ummdustry@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Exactly.

          See my original comment: “I do agree PR is better than FPTP”.

          It’s good because it’s democratic, not because it particularly favours or dis-favours fascism.