• SomeDude@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah that will certainly solve all of the main issues that our societies face today. Climate change, extreme poverty unseen since the 1920’s, fascists, war…but telling people how to dress, yeah. This is important right now.

      • SomeDude@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not supposed to?

        Yes, that’s exactly the point: It is a meaningless measure improving absolutely nothing, but throwing another hate-treat to the rabid racist crowd while blowing the dog whistle so hard, it sounds like a foghorn. It’s legislative procrastination with hate.

        What a stupid take.

        What a stupid law.

      • SomeDude@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, you could’ve reminded me a bit nicer of my oversight, but yeah, I totally forgot that one.

          • SomeDude@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Taking away a woman’s choice is not helping against sexism. Only a sexist would think that.

            • electrogamerman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Making women have to cover themselves to be pure is sexist AF, especially because muslim men can dress whatever they want. The whole philosophy that socializes women to willingly do this to themselves is the problem, and a problem that is enforced by muslim religion.

              “no, you are the sexist for not letting us make women dress how we want”. What a joke.

              • SomeDude@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Making women have to cover themselves to be pure is sexist AF, especially because muslim men can dress whatever they want. The whole philosophy that socializes women to willingly do this to themselves is the problem, and a problem that is enforced by muslim religion.

                Oh, so these women live in a free society that gives them the right to chose what they want to wear (= Switzerland), and it’s actually their men who tell them how to dress? But your response to that situation is to limit the rights of the women to chose instead of limiting the men responsible?

                Yeah, found the male, sexist, christian extremist. Don’t try to pretend that you actually give a single shit about these women, I can see through your excuses.

                • electrogamerman@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You forgot to read this:

                  “The whole philosophy that socializes women to willingly do this to themselves is the problem”

                  • brainrein@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    So you’re trying to fight one religious philosophy by forcing women to follow the rules of your own philosophy. You’re definitely not fighting for any kind of freedom. I am convinced that there are quite a lot young well educated and integrated Muslim women here in Berlin who wear the headscarf as a sign of rebellion against white people’s racism. Just like I used my long manly hair in the 70s to detect assholes and fascists. Worked perfectly.

                    (I know headscarves are not forbidden by the law. I also know that thousands of racists don’t give a shit about that and will use arguments like yours to harass and assault Muslim women in the real world. That’s why I despise people like you.)

      • alehc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe you are being downvoted because you are not adding anything to the conversation either? What does that suppose to mean?

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I haven’t even made made any sort or argument for or against yet and am still downvoted

        “I haven’t actually said anything and my post has no value”

        Sounds like downvotes are working as intended.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Once again, seeing as OP hasn’t replied to you, there is no reason not to sort this to the bottom/hide it as there’s no value here to anyone else reading the comments.

            This is easily avoided by simply saying “If you live in Europe, {Argument for people living in Europe}. If you don’t live in Europe, {Argument for people not living in Europe}” As both groups of people will be reading your comment.