• darkdemize@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think you need to reevaluate your position. Chalking this up to “women’s rights” is disingenuous at best.

      Rowling is lobbying to exclude trans women from being legally recognized as women. You’re free to pick a side there, and I’m free to call you a transphobe if you agree with her.

      What cis woman is hurt by a trans woman being legally recognized as a woman?

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      When you have to use veiled hints instead of clearly stating your point, you either know you’re wrong or you’re ashamed of your belief.

    • auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      They are an anti-women’s right organisation. Trans women are women.

      They don’t need vested interests to campaign against them.