• Beastimus@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ok, here’s my perspective. I hate Gen-AI (specifically and solely the generative kind), I think in nearly 100% of its use cases there are more effective and more ethical solutions. Its really sketchy to me for any artist to be using or supporting AI with/in their work. My understanding is that while training the AI does take significant server farm work (on a similar scale to like, storing the data for streaming video), the actual AI model produced is relatively small, and therefore doesn’t take that much energy to run. So, good on them for doing environmental work, my hangups will entirely be on the ethical side of their AI usage.

  • Ilixtze@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    For me the problem with AI generated thumbnails in any environmental or scientific blog is that it makes me doubt the whole text might be a AI Hallucination and I just immediately click out.

    AI images just kill all credibility for me.

  • JandroDelSol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Honestly, any blog claining to be informative qhile usung AI thumbnails makes me extremely wary. If they can’t even find a stock photo, who’s to say they did any research, or worse, just wrote the entire article with gen ai

  • arakhis_@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    When the environmentalism memer is being petty about the small issues instead of making the discussion about the big sectors of personal consumption like heating/power source, nutrition and mobility

    And yes, AI in creative sectors bad

    • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Also who’s to say the person isn’t running the AI model locally off of renewable energy?

      You don’t have to use a centralized service, shit like ComfyUI exist

    • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      And how much CO2 was produced training the AI that was put on your device? How many slaves spent how many hours generating data to train that AI? How many slaves cut down how many forests to extract the materials that how many slaves turned into the chips that ran the training process?

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        And how much CO2 was produced training the AI that was put on your device?

        I mean, fuck Apple and fuck AI. But at some point “I noticed your picture was rendered with software that uses electricity that may have come from a fossil fuel power source, so I’m going to disregard environmentalism carte blanche” is just reactionary anti-environmentalist rhetoric couched in smug liberalist language.

  • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Because this is what we need to be focusing on, not environmental responsibility from large polluters.

    We are continually approving oil, gas, and coal projects, yet let’s focus on the contradiction of environmentalists existing in a system where their very existence causes them to emit, regardless of how careful their choices.

    Don’t worry about this, it’s fine

    It’s just sitting there menacingly next to the Athabasca river.