The Republican president on social media objected to what he said were 18 agents assigned to Hunter Biden’s protective detail while in South Africa this week. He said Ashley Biden has 13 agents assigned to her detail and that she too “will be taken off the list.”

There was no immediate reaction from the former president’s office.

Former presidents and their spouses receive life-long Secret Service protection under federal law, but the protection afforded to their immediate families over the age of 16 ends when they leave office. But outgoing presidents can extend protection for those who might otherwise not be eligible for up to six months after they leave office, something Biden did for his children and Trump did for his family after leaving office in 2021. Former Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush also extended protection for their families for a period.

  • LonstedBrowryBased@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Nice whoever comes after trump should end his secret service detail and the ones for all his little nazi offspring too

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        I don’t understand how so many people don’t realize how serious shit is at the moment.

          • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I think it might be Barron. The media has been starting to glaze him and give him some air time and float his name. Don Jr has been doing tons of really cringe campaigning for El Presidente, but given he hasn’t really been talked about in the media, I don’t think they’re floating him next

          • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            29
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Also bold of him to assume the democratic party is capable of change.

          • samus12345@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Not too bold, since states run elections, and blue states will continue to run normal ones. Red, states, though? Oh, those’ll be corrupt up the wazoo.

            • eldavi@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 hours ago

              and they’re a majority by almost 2:1, guaranteeing republican victories going forward.

              • samus12345@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                50 minutes ago

                Yup. It’s grim nationally, but at least blue states have a change of not being total shitholes within.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Ending it 3 months early… hell I was going to say how Petty sounding but yeah course it is.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      16 hours ago

      That makes it worse. It means the only reason to do it is to call attention to the removal of protection, like “Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest opposition member?”

  • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    I hear Canada is nice this time of year. They might relax their drug-related restrictions for Hunter.

  • rigatti@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    OK so this is actually pretty normal?

    Edit: For all the Lemmings out there having trouble understanding, you don’t have to read the article, but at least read the summary. Their USSS protection would end in a few months anyway. Trump is a colossal asshole, yes, but they’re only getting a few months less of USSS protection. The length of time they get protection is fairly normal.

      • rigatti@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        18 hours ago

        That is pretty fucked up indeed. I still doubt anyone attacks them or anything.

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Maybe, maybe. But the way stochastic terrorism works is you just roll the dice against long odds over and over and eventually someone does what you’re suggesting.

          • rigatti@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            17 hours ago

            If their USSS protection would have ended in like July anyway, couldn’t a potential attacker have just waited until then to do whatever they’re gonna do? I get that by calling attention to it, Trump increases the odds of an attack though.

            • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              19
              ·
              17 hours ago

              I get that by calling attention to it, Trump increases the odds of an attack though.

              Yeah that’s really the whole of it. They’re not trying to get smart professional people to shoot their enemies. They want to get impulsive people. That person isn’t likely to go look up these things but if they get the idea put in front of them they might act

    • AmidFuror@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Trump did for his family after leaving office in 2021.

      It’s normal to extend it. It’s not normal for the next President to end it. Especially when that hypocrite did it for his own offspring just 4 years earlier.

      • rigatti@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Right, I’m talking about the time length. 6 months normally versus 2 months here. In the grand scheme of things, not that big of a deal. It’s not like they would have had lifetime protection and now he’s cancelling that.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          It’s the cancelling that’s the unusual part. There’s no reason to other than to be an asshole. And calling attention to the fact that these people (some who are violently hated by MAGA) are now “unprotected” is… you get it.

        • tomi000@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Dude you just said 2 months was ‘normal’ now youre literally saying the opposite (6 months normal)

      • rigatti@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        30
        ·
        18 hours ago

        This is how the fuck:

        “But outgoing presidents can extend protection for those who might otherwise not be eligible for up to six months after they leave office”

        It would end in a few months anyway. Yeah he’s being petty and he’s a dickhead, but it’s not that big of a difference.

        • Ele7en7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Thank you for proving my point. I think you need to look up the definition of normal, because you obviously don’t have a fucking clue what normal is.

          • rigatti@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            18 hours ago

            How did I prove your point at all? I’m talking about the time range of protection ending. There’s like a three month difference. In the realm of terrible things Trump has done so far, this is barely noticeable.

            • Ele7en7@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Lmao 🤣 your initial comment said this was pretty normal. It’s literally never happened. As for your other argument, maybe look up some dates or something.

              • rigatti@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                19
                ·
                18 hours ago

                Hello? Are we even having a conversation or are you just ecstatic that you got a chance to be smug on the internet? What dates am I supposed to look up? The summary said they usually get six months of protection after the former president’s term ends. So they’ll be missing out on 4 months of protection that they would normally get. Please save your smug energy for the actual Trump supporters.

                • tomi000@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  13 hours ago

                  You just literally used the word ‘normal’ again for the opposite of your point. They would ‘normally’ get 6 months, how could 2 months be normal then?

                  Please just admit you used the word normal wrong, theres no need to keep up this charade to save face.

                • Ele7en7@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  So, 2 months versus 6 months means nothing. It’s totally normal for Trump to vindictively take away 66% of their protection? And, I said look up some dates because you originally said 3 months. Keep it up, my smugness intensifies.

    • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Forcefully ending the protection early despite it being established by the previous president? Hell no.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      19 hours ago

      normal? for the diaper-in-chief to be a petty whiny little baby? yup.