Or to Anonymous for that matter?

  • Vanth@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Not to be a “just Google it” type person, but I personally would read the Wikipedia articles on each. Wikipedia still has to be taken with skepticism, especially on decentralized movements that some would like to see be declared domestic terrorists, but I would believe Wikipedia more than randos on the internet.

    For example, I am the King of Anonymous. I see everything. I hear everything. We are merely waiting in the shadows for our next opportunity. Oooooor, I’m just a nobody lying online for giggles.

    I think the real answer is they were decentralized and people picked up or dropped the Anonymous or Antifa label as it was useful to them. There have been so many conspiracy theories and misinformation campaigns on both, mentioning them is guaranteed to get 95% of people bored and trying to to change topics. So for people trying to get attention, identifying as Antifa or Anonymous probably doesn’t help them these days.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      So for people trying to get attention, identifying as Antifa […] probably doesn’t help them these days.

      People doing actions for clout are likely to be shunned as opportunistic. A well-known antifascist guide to doxxing Nazis straight up says [paraphrasing] “seeking clout will make people skeptical of your actions, just don’t do it”.