• silvercove@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    In Germany there are massive tax advantages to getting married. That is why a lot of people get married in late December of each year.

        • snaptastic@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That only makes sense if you assume that marriage is a purely financial thing. It has lots of other aspects that have nothing to do with money that a lot of people dislike.

  • Littleborat@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    There has to be some (dis)incentive to have children without marriage in some contries and not others.

    I Germany I guess people think you might as well marry when having children because you get extra money, less taxes whatever and maybe that’s not the case in other countries.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Marriage is a civil institution in Germany. A church marrying you has exactly as much legal power as a random citizen doing it: None. You get married at the civil registry office, by a bureaucrat (but yes they’re amenable to some mild ceremony)

  • magikmw@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can we get another map about inceptions out of mariage? Many marry only after learning they will be parents.

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mis-reporting or not reporting births, probably. That’s far too low to be realistic.

    • kernelPanic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Turkish here! The reasons are the fact that we are poor as fuck to finace a newborn baby and the financial incentives of marrying. When you marry usually the tradition is like the bride side funds the ceremony and groom’s side funds the house goods like dish washer, bed etc. You also get lotsa assets from your other relatives, colleagues, and friends. Moreover, both grandparents, being rich boomers, subsidise the cost of grandchild and take care of them. They wouldn’t do so if it was outside marriage because of old school mindset (herritage laws play a big role here too).

    • soviettaters@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re Islamic and have traditional morals. it’s better for the kid if they’re married anyways.

  • Lt. Worf, son of Mogh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s so many kids growing up without married parents, and not even counting the ones that will divorce during their lifetime.

    I’m not religious or anything, but I worry about the stability of these households and what kind of life these kids will have.

    • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly, it’s way better to have parents stay together in stable, forced marital bondage and hate each other more and more every day like god intended.

      Sure, dad cheats on mom, sometimes even beats her, and mom is secretly a depressive alcoholic, but separation would be superduper bad for the child!

    • IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You know people can live happily together without being married right? Marriage is not a indicator of a stable household. Also many couples are in a civil union after the kid is born.

      Also guess which country UNICEF says where the children are the happiest and is the best place to raise kids? It ain’t Turkey or Belarus. It’s the Netherlands. All those Dutch bastards live very happy lives.