Has YouTube experienced enshittification?

  • prototype_g2@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    38 minutes ago

    Well… One more reason to ditch YouTube. As always: Reminder PeerTube exists.

    I know the network effect is powerful, but YouTube won’t lose until people are fed up enough to not use it.

  • DragonsInARoom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I bet that when they do this that older videos with newer thumbnails will get more clickthroughs and watch time same that of the newest uploads, but it won’t be as effective with documentary / science videos (vsause, veritasium ect) because their videos are highly memorable. This will have a bad effect on the end user filtering out low effort video farms that show up in the search results, because those videos tend to have 100 views - 10k views.

  • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    About 15 years ago Microsoft had this great idea.

    What if we forced everyone to use our software on the web so they can’t buy it.

    Macros will no longer work, but not many people use macros so fuck those guys, they are nerds anyway.

    This became the heyday of the Libre Software movement. And the reason I still occasionally use it.

    Companies run on the simple automation the nerds create with Macros and companies aren’t going to hire a bunch more clerks so they can pay more for shittier software.

    TL;DR, Microsoft backed down when people voted with their feet and not before.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I guess they really want to get rid of users huh.

    I watch tech videos. If I can’t see when a video is from, I’m not going to waste my time on watching it.

    Conspiracy time: Google is purposely making their video platform worse because they’re sacrificing it for a tax loss in 5 years when they shut it down. In those five years they’re going to “ramp up” development and write off all that “work” to pay for other projects.

    Their UX and design choices are amateur at best and clearly they have no interest in maintaining the product(much like all of their retired line).

  • Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Wow, your algorithm shows the exact same videos that mine does. I’ve never seen that before. Every time I check out someone else’s YouTube, their homepage is completely different from mine.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    14 hours ago

    What would removing the dates accomplish except making things more confusing and harder to find? What advantage to YouTube is there?

  • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Well, time to install two new add-ons: Return YouTube View Counts and Return YouTube Upload Dates.

    Somebody please make those.

    • nepenthes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Yes, please! Also, would the add on make the date searchable again?

      Because anything that has had an update is now a clusterfuck… say I want to see how to change a calendar setting in godforsaken Outlook, searching by date is necessary b/c who knows what the version number is.

      Or games like Path of Exile, where three months can render some information obsolete because it’s a league system.

  • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I can’t stand YouTube’s feed. It’s so bad. This does not help. I know many others already said it, but this is not an improvement.

    The date can matter a lot. Especially, when it comes to tech learning. That world moves too fast. If you’re learning programming on YouTube, you need to be sure you have current info.

    I desperately with YouTube had real competition.

    • Joeffect@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      So I just installed Linux on a new computer and during the short install I went to YouTube for something but it didn’t even give me a list of videos to watch instead it told me I had to search so it can build a list of videos to recommend.

      I’m not sure if this is a new change or what but along with this and taking away information I’m ready to just drop YouTube altogether probably better for my health… There is one service that was created by the people who do jetlag I might give them a try at this point.

      • jh34ghu43gu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’ve had watch history off since like 2015 and sometime in 2021(?) they blanked the home page on me and said I had to turn history back on. It got fixed for a bit in 2022 (based on my discord chat logs) but then got cleared again later. Now it’s just a blank page; they don’t even tell me to turn history back on, but that could be my revert layout extension cause the giant thumbnails suck ass. Still salty they removed day markers on the subscription page since that’s how I kept track of what I still hadn’t watched.

        Anyway, when they cleared it again for me in 2022/2023 is probably when they stopped giving signed-out new sessions a feed.

      • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        There is one service that was created by the people who do jetlag I might give them a try at this point.

        Nebula is pretty good, and has a lot of creators on it, but I personally have had issues with videos buffering or not being playable until 5-10 seconds after clicking on them. It might just be my browser (I use Firefox with a ton of various extensions and settings changes that affect rendering and content loading), but it’s something to note depending on how much you care about the user experience.

        I think they let you view a video or two for free though, so you can test that out beforehand if you wanted to.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The date can matter a lot.

      The original algorithm rewarded engagement absent dates, but this resulted in old classic hits mopping up revenue while newer stuff struggled to grab anyone’s attention. You’ll never make a music video more popular than Rick Astley’s Never Gonna Give You Up, so why bother trying?

      Then the algorithm shifted to fresh-first bias, which incentivized streamers to constantly churn out new content. But it still contended with users who stubbornly wanted to see the old content. So you got a bunch of content that tried to imitate historical hits or play on trends. This ended up producing 10,000 videos named some variation of “Rick Astley’s Never Gonna Give You Up, Explained” with a digitally edited picture of the singer with big eyes and a soy face.

      Now we’ve got this deluge of AI generated crap that nobody wants to look at or search for, piling up in YouTube’s back catalog. The only way to justify hosting it is to jam it into someone’s feed. So every user is being A/B Tested once again, with a new procedurally generated wall of garbage that will eventually narrow down what any given individual is most likely to click on and watch. Then we can solve both of the problems above. Always have new content, but its technically “fresh” rather than a rehash of some prior release.

      We are doing Monkeys On Typewriters because someone at YouTube HQ decided it was better than letting anyone watch the Rick Astley video one more time.

      I desperately with YouTube had real competition.

      There are other places to host video, but they tend to be very boutique or with an abundance of very low quality content. That, plus YouTube leveraging economies of scale and the networking effect means there’s nowhere else you’d ever want to try and host a video, unless you were looking to reach a very boutique audience or you were putting out material you didn’t really expect anyone to watch.

  • net00@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Has YouTube experienced enshittification?

    Ummm, only for the past decade?

  • TheV2@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Hopefully they’ll remove the length, the channel name, the thumbnail, the title and the entire video, too.

  • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    18 hours ago

    It’s because users are less likely to watch old videos. They do this on TikTok. You’ll see videos that are years old on your feed because they have a lack of new content. You watch the new videos and then move on with your day. Now you’re getting shown more videos and more likely to stay.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 day ago

    Sometimes I watch videos of The Daily Show and it drives me bonkers that they upload old episodes from a decade ago and it’s impossible to tell if it’s current Daily Show, or the classic one. If the whole service was like that… I’m completely gone.

  • Tuxman@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    This is so stupid… I can give a personal exemple that happened to me today!

    I just got into Lorcana and I want to learn a bit more about the meta and where the strategies are at. The damn thing got like FOUR expansions in a year!! So a video that came out during release is already WAY out of date!

  • Cossty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Return YouTube dislikes will change to

    Return YouTube dislikes + view count + upload date