The Supreme Court has rejected an emergency appeal from Nevada’s Green Party seeking to include presidential candidate Jill Stein on the ballot in the battleground state.

The court’s order Friday, without any noted dissents, allows ballot preparation and printing to proceed in Nevada without Stein and other Green Party candidates included.

The outcome is a victory for Democrats who had challenged the Greens’ inclusion on the ballot in a state with a history of extremely close statewide races. In 2020, President Joe Biden outpaced former President Donald Trump by fewer than 35,000 votes in the state.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    while normally I’d be upset if they were running somebody with some kind of real intent to push real issues, its clear Stein is mostly isnt interested in pushing anything but conspiracy theories and russian appeasement.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      But if we don’t vote 3rd party then democrats will never do the exact things I want, or some shit

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’ll be voting solid blue regardless, but the “exact things I want” in regards to Democrats is not helping a genocide, because I thought that was a bar even they could pass.

        I’m not surprised they failed even that, but it does radicalize me further and solidify my position that all liberals that call themselves leftists out of rampant ignorance can fuck off forever.

        • ripcord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          And that will definitely change by voting 3rd party Ina presidential election!!

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes, that latter point does describe how well you have summarized other people’s arguments. Good luck to you on that one.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Considering there is not a good argument for voting for a third party presidential candidate in this election vs. not voting at all, I don’t think the summary matters.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        people forget about her vaccine skepticism, which is sad in a post covid world. There’s a reason she didnt run in 2020

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          Stein is pro-vaccine, as she has stated in numerous interviews. If she had won in 2016, we would’ve had a medical doctor in the White House during a pandemic, and hundreds of thousands of lives could’ve been saved.