I mean lets not overdo it the algorithms were becoming very trash before it was bought up but it was usable. Peak twitter was like 2017

You mean the “radical liberal elite” that are “indoctrinating our children” and secretly control our country???

Clearly some people do, and more people try. Whether they “generally” do doesn’t matter. What’s important is that “enough” people do to prevent humanity from selecting one of our myriad possible self extinctions.

wish we had that kind of moral integrity here.

Turns out paving and polluting everything does a lot of damage to biodiversity.

(please support public transit and fight parking minimums.)

Hopefully what’s left of the business is sued into the ground for such willful negligence

supreme court gonna allow this deadly nonsense and turn hospitals into religious death panels. Let the doctors decide things not a bunch of bean counters

So you’re saying the AI should own the things it makes?

Broken analogies aside, The twin major problems are

1. most the data is still intact that AI often recreates it. I think court cases about this are ongoing.

2. It breaks authorship chains. humans often have to wade through ads or buy products to ‘add data’ to themselves. So if you buy a magazine, you often contribute back to the source artists. or even cite them. AI does not do this. Which is why licensing datasets is a proposed solution to prevent AI from being a death spiral for creativity.

no gels allowed

this is how final fantasy villains work

are you suggesting the ai itself owns the copyright?

At least station some US troops there or something

This is one of like 5 celebrities I would vote for if running for president.

Psycho gonna psycho.

“I’mma need to be greedy with you because my wife is asian” AKA why capitalists will always side with racism even if its a transparent attempt to bilk people of money.

if you make a magazine collage you’ve already paid all the magazine authors for their work by buying the magazine. I know its not perfect, but at least in a collage situation there is some form of monetary trail going back to the artists.

If the AI company were to license their training data this would be an almost perfect metaphor. But the problem is we’ve let them weasel in without monetary attribution.

its debatable who the artist is, however, because if you remove the ai from the picture he could never have made this, and if you remove the training data the results would also be different.

Realistically: everyone whose data this was trained on should be included as authors if its not just public domain

Investors and Airbnb have really undermined historical market forces here. also data pricing apps that fix prices between “competitors” should be noted here

The problem with these people is even when they shoot each other they somehow also manage to hit an innocent bystander. Real purge situations from the past are basically just like old school KKK lynchings.

the problem is Snowden wasn’t selling products to the US military, which is apparently a get out of jail free card