• gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    So she wants a guy with a low sex drive, who she doesnt have to have any emotional attachment to, but who emotionally invested in her, that doesnt have any self confidence, and doesnt know any feminist theory so he cant tell he’s in a toxic relationship and doesnt treat her like “shit” (an equal)

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Hmm I think you might be some of the red flags she’s talking about especially the manipulative one.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        She literally said she doesn’t want a guy who is sensitive and doesn’t want a guy who is emotionally distant. Make it make sense.

        • Smoogs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Well then that’s because you had a READING FAIL or you’re playing syntax argument and pretending that you’re confused.

          Of course It wouldn’t make sense if you stopped reading after the first two words out of two entire sentences. Each point had descriptions but you’re ignoring them just to launch into a pitchfork argument. This is ‘Syntax’ argument. That’s some bad actor energy right there at worst. red herring argument at best.

          So you’re Confused? Go back and reread for more than two words per line. Sound it out loud if you’re still ‘confused’. Talk to an English teacher if need be.

          But personally I don’t believe you are confused. Not today, lil incel. Ya blocked.