• 1 Post
  • 520 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 9th, 2023

help-circle







  • I’ve been able to get demos of autopilot in one of my friend’s cars, and I’ll always remember autopilot correctly stopping at a red light, followed by someone in the next lane over blowing right through it several seconds later at full speed.

    Unfortunately “better than the worst human driver” is a bar we passed a long time ago. From recent demos I’d say we’re getting close to the “average driver”, at least for clear visibility conditions, but I don’t think even that’s enough to have actually driverless cars driving around.

    There were over 9M car crashes with almost 40k deaths in the US in 2020, and that would be insane to just decide that’s acceptable for self driving cars as well. No company is going to want that blood on their hands.





  • xthexder@l.sw0.comtoScience Memes@mander.xyzTrick OR Treat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    I had to double-take since in Python a common alternative to trick ? treat : notreat is (trick and treat) or notreat

    But I don’t think this translates to overlapping circles very well. “trick implies treat” is only defined inside the trick circle, outside is undefined if treat is true or not.

    I’m not going to draw a diagram, but here’s the “truth table” for A implies B:

    A, B, A -> B
    N, N, undefined
    N, Y, undefined
    Y, N, false
    Y, Y, true
    


  • I don’t think that matters, since when bruteforcimg a passphrase it’s more like using whole words as the characters (or tokens) in the password. If there’s 7776 possible unique words, it doesn’t matter what characters are in the words at all. Just how many password combinations are used.

    Side note, this is assuming words without character replacements. If you consider variations with A->@ or B->8 there ends up being significantly more possible unique “words”





  • xthexder@l.sw0.comtoScience Memes@mander.xyz...
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    I think we have a fundamental disagreement on what counts as science, and that’s okay.

    Your methodology seems to imply a valid scientific experiment must be sufficiently rigorous as to improve on the current scientific consensus. And I do partially agree, it’s a waste of time collecting data that’s just going to be worse than previously collected, more controlled experiments.

    By my philosophy is a lot looser. To quote Adam Savage: “The only difference between screwing around and science, is writing it down”


  • xthexder@l.sw0.comtoScience Memes@mander.xyzHalf as Hot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    People don’t use Kelvin when referring to seasons. Sure, there’s plenty of ambiguity if someone says it’s 32° out without specifying the units, and you can infer from context, but that has nothing to do with Kelvin starting at absolute zero. Saying “degrees” immediately rules out Kelvin as a unit.