It’s called fine-tuning, and if everyone gave up that easily, many domains would suffer, like medicine, architecture, manufacturing design etc. Don’t be afraid of something simply because the ideal fix is more complicated than 2+2.
It’s called fine-tuning, and if everyone gave up that easily, many domains would suffer, like medicine, architecture, manufacturing design etc. Don’t be afraid of something simply because the ideal fix is more complicated than 2+2.
Hm… what if downvoting was weighted only 1/10th as much as upvoting? So a few downvotes here and there from people doing it wrong wouldn’t amount to anything in others’ view, but if a post is heavily downvoted due to being in the wrong community or low effort, that’s visible?
Go to HomeGoods. Get a cart. Walk through the whole store. Pick 1 item per aisle and put it in your cart. Buy the items and put them in your kitchen.
Basically, I’m seeing a lot of blank white. Not very charming.
You are using “some people misuse a thing” as a rationale to get rid of the thing.
If someone posts fetish x on a vanilla community, they should get downvoted. If they post that same thing in a community about fetish x, then the community can simply be blocked by those so inclined.
Ok. I generally like being able to see things.
This is also a frustration of mine. Selecting copy text on the whole post can be unwieldy with long posts.
I don’t know if it aged horribly but I have no interest in rewatching The Cosby Show.
I like burgers
But not every burger
Cross-post the thing to another instance, then share that link.
Lucky you
They suck
I have unknowingly avoided this by having the thumbnails show uncensored
Agatha has the best continuation rate of any Marvel show they’ve released after four episodes here. Meaning week to week, it has retained the largest percentage of viewers
I guess this was fixed at some point, as I can dismiss them easily now.
… just make sure you don’t light the grass or your neighbor’s house on fire
It’s showing averages. Just because certain scores are possible for an individual doesn’t mean there’s a district somewhere with that average score.
My credit score is not shown here because there is no district with that average score.
The wording is correct! Though I would have made show plural, as a singular noun there implies a person can’t have more than one.
Blocking user for censorship
Blocking user for censorship
Nobody who would remove them in the first place would give a shit whether they’re endangered
People with vested interest hope money machine go brrrr instead of clunk