Feynman answering “Why is ice slippery”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36GT2zI8lVA

Why are you not disturbed by the fact that when you push down on a chair it pushes you back?

I expected this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36GT2zI8lVA

Ah, you’re viewing it as a timetravellers’ dilemma.

My view was more that we’re an observer in the lagrangian solution to the differential equation we call life. The electron, being a constant in the equation. Remove the electron, you alter the equation, therefore destroying known life.

The reverse, actually.

I’ve since found help at an institute that specializes in my particularities, I’m happy to share.

I’m learning to be kind to myself, too. Slowly.

I detect you therefore you’re no longer a wave.

How could you destroy 2, if there’s only one?

We are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively.

We all understand the point. But it’s important to question the source. It suggests a gullability, or fabrication.

Do you work in that field?

Scapegoat tree ftw

Love those too!

Delightful!

I’ll keep my eyes open for those next spring

Oh the colors

People used to make all kinds of stuff from the bark, too

Bending in the wind like a ballerina

Give it a try. There’s different brands. I learned that I quite prefer those with milk based protein, and dislike those with pea based protein.

In my case, they did. Yes, of course there is more context.

Had 2 psychologists refuse to work with me, after they got to know me

Stochastic parrot is a term describing your experience with AI.

I’ve an aunt like that, ready to engage in every conversation despite not understanding the topic. Regugitating whatever she saw on her tv, in her own words.

So in a sense, the current large language models do mimic some human’s behaviour.