“So, I’m more conservative leaning (European wise) but everywhere I go - the communities are usually filled with so much hate.” Maybe there is some correlation between the two things…

something something broken watch be right

I love your optimism…

because you’re on the internet and people say this ironically as a joke. If you’re being honest, sorry this sucks but it is what it is.

Probably, after all linux users favorite pastime is reinstalling the system and complaining.

Be careful you’re going to start a war. But to answer your question (simply and superficially) there is nothing wrong with systemd, the hate comes mainly from a philosophical issue. It was created to replace old systems related to the basic functioning of the OS (process management, hardware, etc.), and people complain that it has a feature creep problem because it has subsystems to replace different areas of the OS and purists don’t like it, and is true that it can replace several areas but you can choose which areas are replaced, it’s not like you have to.

Another problem is that there is (or was, I don’t follow these things) friction between the Kernel and systemd, as systemd developers did not respect certain development philosophies.

There are several technicalities and nuances to this story but I don’t feel like writing a book, so I hope this at least partially answers your question.

not by default, but you can install with “apt install kubuntu-desktop”, pop os is Ubuntu based so the desktops from Ubuntu work with it

looks great man!

something something It’s a feature, not a bug…

Bye, don’t let the door hit you on the way out…

important detail, this news is from last year

boost and sync

let me get this straight, the government doesn’t regulate something and leaves it to the “invisible hand of the market”, it becomes corrupt and fraudulent, so the solution to the problem is to nationalize it to solve a problem that you created yourself by not regulate? Of course because the government doesn’t have a drop of corruption in the system. You need to stop drinking toilet water!

for money! this isn’t a charity that anyone can take as they need it, you have to pay. Since that way we will nationalize all stores and websites, walmart, cosco… you know what, my fault for feeding the trolls, and I should have seen that the comment came from a lemmygrad user.

and Jerry rig everything converted a hummer to EV, and the project is already complete, so you can get a better idea of the work involved

I understand dividing the company since they even make cars (Rivian), now… nationalize? What justifies nationalizing a private company that does not provide anything critical to the country? you have to be trolling…

What happened that suddenly the FCC decided to work?

good luck with that, they’ve been trying for 20 years

“Modi likes to pose macho” I had no idea he did these antics too, but it’s not surprising, every authoritarian conservative likes to pose as a strongman. Putin, Xi, Trump, Bolsonaro…

From what I read the importance is only for Bakhmut itself, if you look on the map the city is just a point, we are talking about 6km of a 140km front line (from Bakhmut to the border with Russia). Unlike the Kerch Bridge, there are several other roads and railways to carry out logistics in the region, it is not as if this were the only option. Another detail is that these roads are so close to the front line that they all can be harassed by any artillery system in operation on both sides. but what do I know? I’m just spitting out what I read, but the consensus seems to be that Bakhmut has consumed and is consuming more resources than it is worth, and I have read several times by different analysts the comparison between Bunker Hill and Bakhmut.