I think you misunderstand. Psychologists may presumably refuse to work with individuals with this user’s particular neurodivergence.

It’s not exactly the same as a real life situation, but Tony Soprano’s psychiatrist eventually refuses to work with him over some (perhaps misdiagnosed) sociopathy.

I don’t think that speaks to my point. Capitalism is flawed with or without nepotism.

Nepotism obviously existed before capitalism, and it will surely exist at some level in the next economic system, but it’s not an either/or. There are many, many problems with capitalism that would probably still exhibit if nepotism somehow immediately ceased.

You don’t vote for president directly in the US, you vote for your state to send its votes to that ticket.

Nothing anybody will explain here will be as good as a quick video. I suggest searching your question into your search engine of choice

If nobody is paying attention, then nobody will care about not getting paid. It may sound disappointing, but I’m sure a German who wants something specific can find ways to get to it.

I’m a smart-ass. It cuts nails.

Yeah and it’s giraffe, not jiraffe. See how that gets us nowhere?

Debunked? Its a counterpoint to the fact that it’s pronounced that way because it’s spelled with a g. If that poor argument wasn’t used, the giraffe one wouldn’t have to come up. It’s not evidence of anything other than that letters can be pronounced in more than one way.

For the graphical thing, imagine pronouncing NASA wrong because of the way aeronautical is pronounce. Or underwater in scuba. World in WHO? The I in AIDS isn’t pronounced anything like immunodeficiency.

Your argument doesn’t work either.

With the other pronunciation. Some letters have more than one. Your statement is nonsense lol

So how do you pronounce giraffe?

Udderly silly, guy

Really milking it aren’t you

Bullish behavior

Don’t have a cow

Haha pun thread moo yourself

I’ve stolen copies of your memoire, that’s for sure.

Yes! I like that best.

“because they take things literally” works better in my humble opinion.

I attempted to clarify that I understood that the income of the employee is not part of the profit

25% is a terrible deal and that was my point

Wait so are employees lucky if they get 25% of the money they earn their employer beyond their cost to the employer?

That is, if I cost 100k including benefits and support staff costs and my work directly generates 200k profit over all costs, does that mean that the business should pass 50k to me and take the remaining 150k in order to follow the quick rule?