Lemmy.world has not defederated lemmy.ml

You should edit your post; you’re spreading disinformation.

Oh man, I hadn’t heard of the DMA before. How exciting!

Yes, but GDPR doesn’t cover copyright - it covers personal/identifiable data. Unless I am very mistaken?

That’s why rather than trying to change people’s mind on the internet, I’ve resorted to just ridiculing them instead.

Gotta choose progressively smaller instances until you self-host.

Sorry, how is GDPR relevant here?

How depressing. Makes me wonder if that’s part of the reason I’m struggling to switch careers, because though I’m well qualified for my desired role - I don’t fit the stereotypical career history.

I mean, Lemmy has the exact same potential for issues with admins and mods - the key difference being that if those issues happen you can just up and off to another instance without having to abandon Lemmy altogether.

Resorting to name calling is a sure way to indicate you’ve been backed into a logical corner, and don’t want to challenge your own beliefs, so you have to denigrate your opponent.

What about your height? My wife and I did the C25k together - I’m 6’1", she’s 5’6". Took a fair bit longer for her to break 5k in 30 mins than me, but she was working much harder.

Have you tried Liftoff? Way better than Connect or Jerboa in my opinion.

I never see Liftoff recommended in these kinds of threads. It’s my favourite app so far out of Thunder, Connect, and Jerboa.

But that’s the great thing about Lemmy - you can just go to another instance and continue using Lemmy if you disagree with some admins decisions.

What’s your complaint?

Thanks. China looks like it might have a big problem on its hands with that large volume of young men without partners.

Big yikes on that pyramid. Please could you share where you got it from?

It is in Liftoff.

Depends how we define ‘overcome’ really. I mean, if cooperation is evidence of overcoming it then the question doesn’t need to be asked.

If we’re talking about our biological instinct for tribalism, well that’s why we’re having the conversation isn’t it.

Yes. Reductive in a crude way, not clarifying. I don’t think the parent comment at all implied humans are inherently bad and the occasional good doesn’t matter.

Rather inversely, humans are tribalistic but achieve good in spite of tribalism.

That’s a bit of a reductive take on the parent comment.

Human nature to cooperate and share is not mutually exclusive with forming in-groups and out-groups.

Well the prototype wasn’t even legs, so maybe we should just come up with an entirely new model?

I vote hexapod.