that’s not what duverger’s “law” says.
that’s not what duverger’s “law” says.
hate this idea that it’s somehow principled to allow the fascist to win.
i hate to break it to you, but the secret service is allowing him to win. the democrat-run justice department is allowing him to win. you are allowing him to win. you could stop him. but you don’t really believe he’s a threat. you’re just berating people who won’t join your team.
no one is disenfranchising dem voters at all
if their goal was to find an alternate to trump and biden, what do you think they’d be doing now? my guess is they’d be waiting to see if they can actually get behind whatever the dems do next.
Israel props them up
if i elect an average right wing conservative (which is redundant) and they go on to do bad things, which is practically guaranteed, I would not feel better.
but what happens if you vote for someone and they end up winning?
they pay you because they get paid by advertisers. cut them out of the middle and go directly to the companies running ads on your vids.
youtube pays you even if the content isn’t worth getting paid for
if alphabet’s shareholders heard this, they would take them to court. it can’t be true. and if they’re willing to pay, someone else will be, too.
don’t count on it.
so? find someone to pay you.
if you can’t find someone willing to pay you to make content, maybe your content isn’t worth getting paid for.
oh shit. super bad guy. glad i never installed a fucking client. fuck everything about this.
i don’t trust it because it is very big on the design meaning to be “censorship resistant” and there are certain kinds of posts that people make that probably should be censored, and while i like that some tools exist to make pseudononymous, censorship-resistant communications possible (tor and i2p are good. freenet is fine imho), this one looks like a grift that has a neon sign saying “censorship resistant”… and i am sure that associating with those people will lead to encountering some of that material that probably should be censored.
you can make money off-platform from your content. you don’t need to be paid by youtube.
peertube exists. so does owncast
peertube uses webtorrents. it’s viable. it works. owncast is fully self-hosted. it works. all the people downvoting are repeating a talking point, and have never implemented these projects.
peertube uses webtorrents to share bandwidth among users: if you’re watching a video, you share the data to other users at the same time.
nazis aren’t fish. i don’t care to convert them. i want to drive the back under the rock they crawled from under.