The CIA and NSA always have bets running on what will happen, it’s a very accurate way to estimate actual outcome.
The CIA and NSA always have bets running on what will happen, it’s a very accurate way to estimate actual outcome.
Gotta go half and half call them a fuckwit and explain how and why.
Yes and the baby eating lines were ad libbed so the reaction is genuine, no one expected it.
Ed: Via rob lowe
The boot is the best one, that bitch is so dippable.
What’s your stance on the about with Hilary before and during the election up to and including Trump pressing for investigation and moreso to “lock her up”.
Sorta. They’re pointing out the fact is the default is straight, if you want to scream it at people well that’ll cost you some money.
It’s dumb, super petty and ultimately inane as are most identity politics. I get the point to an extent but anything to either extreme gets a bit grating and irritating.
Yes rocks are more sharp on planets or moons with no or very little atmosphere because erosion by wind/rain forces is reduced.
They’re literally calling him a useful idiot… That means something in security circles.
Fun stupid as opposed to what? Stern stupid?
Right. Is this your first time encountering an anarchist?
Left. The word you’re looking for is correct, right is an affirmation or direction. Nothing, I want you to explain your belief system so you can see it in front of you and go "well that’s kinda fuckin stupid huh?.
Undoubtedly so I have no doubt.
Idiots tend to laugh a lot so, par for the course I suppose.
Doubt all you’d like it’s not an argument and you didn’t know me well enough to think anything more or less. But do go on.
Am I? I tend to refrain from calling people monkeys because of the obvious implied racism.
Not at all, there are better forms of haven’t government and given this interaction in 100% proof anarchism doesn’t work.
I told you to fucking read because you didn’t before the edit dipshit, you can’t retroactively act less stupid simply because you edited after the fact. I know what to tell you though, stop crying.
Right is an affirmation of receipt, yes no or maybe are the possible answers and you didn’t choose any of the above and still failed to explain.
Anarchism exists yes, that didn’t imply you are an anarchist you could be part of any similarly idiotic idealist nonsense.
If it’s a battle of wit, you’re losing.
Not at all.
*Edit= sounds like crying about an edit to me.
There’s your explanation then.
No you weren’t, you clearly don’t care or you wouldn’t be playing the troll in another comment chain. Also, no I’m not a conservative and anyway it didn’t make sense in context so it was clearly an error. Again, you tried to make light of the situation and stuck your foot directly in your mouth.
I already did that, fuckin read dude it would solve a lot of these issues.
Yes or no being explainations is what? A new concept to you or something.
So you’re a douche, you could have saved the inane exposition.
I did, you should read again.
You understand what severe dyslexia is correct?
And yet you are still doing it, funny how that is. Notice me not making fun of your disability.
No.
It’s a typo in that it’s an inadvertantly added word in didn’t catch, sure. And yes on both accounts, are you honestly just trying to win “shitty irrelevant things to make fun of” bingo or something?
Ah and yet your last comment said you know me so we know one thing for a fact, you’re a liar for whatever that might be worth.
It’s bad Grammer and highly regionalized at that.
So a douche and an anarchist, who could have guessed that combination.
I did.
We got the douche part already, lets take it back a notch before you cut yourself with all that edge.
Use the office to make convicted felons (in relation to fraud or truthfulness) unable to hold higher office which is the law for most state governments but quizzically not the highest office.