• 0 Posts
  • 115 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 5th, 2025

help-circle



  • Unfortunately, we can’t afford to mess around. The fresh water crisis is something America has to deal with - sooner, rather than later. There are many other crises than water and health care, and they are all very urgent.

    If being a progressive has been reduced to: “I’m slightly to the left of Republicans, but just as pro-capitalist as them”, then the term has been co-opted or watered-down to meaninglessness.

    It’s like the term “Libertarian” being co-opted by capitalists. The original meaning of libertarianism had nothing to do with capitalism, free markets, deregulation, and privatization.




  • Why would Islamic countries not condemn China? They certainly seem to condemn the genocide of the Palestinian people. Somebody please enlighten me.

    Edit: According to Business Insider, they might fear China’s retaliation (e.g. economic vengeance). How reliant are these Islamic countries on exports from China and how reliant are these countries on China importing their resources (e.g. oil)?

    Why would any of that matter when people of their religion are being genocided? Fear of retaliation from a nuclear-powered state and facing consequences in regards to western trade doesn’t seem to deter them from taking a stance on Palestine.


  • The agitators on lemmy definitely push the idea that centrism is bad.

    Centrism gets absolutely nothing done.

    falling for the trap of “I only support candidates 100% aligned with pure progressive values” results in Trump winning.

    Kamala lost because she did not run on any progressive policies and shifted center-right. Supporting fracking got her zero brownie points in PA, for example. She really didn’t run on anything impactful - she was continuing a lot of Biden’s policies, refused to list her policies until very late in the race, and was mainly running on not being Trump. What she was proposing was entirely insufficient to attract voters.

    Did you forget about Obama’s successes? He arguably ran on a progressive platform and his success was explosive.

    But in reality, the progressive candidates get <1% of the vote.

    Gee, I wonder why that is. Progressives generally being anti-corporatist and against funding Іsrаеl unsurprisingly makes Super PACs and foreign agents like АІPАϹ spend lots of money to beat them. All funding should be from small donors to even the playing field - campaign finance reform is needed for fair and democratic elections.

    People vote based on name recognition and what benefits they get by voting for a particular candidate - they aren’t repulsed by progressive policies, they usually just don’t know about progressive candidates or about their policies. Or they are told by mainstream media that the progressive candidate has no chance of winning and to vote for the establishment to beat Republicans.

    The far-leftists who don’t do so well will never be happy

    There are no “far-leftists” in the Democratic party, it’s a right party. All capitalists are firmly on the right and socialists are on the left. There’s very few people who classify themselves as democratic socialists or who are left-leaning. Being a progressive does not make you left-leaning or a democratic socialist - see Elizabeth Warren as an example (she is a progressive capitalist).


  • So according to the “comeback retreat” hosted by the “center-left” group Third Way; the Democrats are too “beholden” to their “far-left members”, they are dismissive of people without progressive views, and the Democrats also need to “embrace patriotism”.

    I’m pretty sure people don’t like Democrats because they keep moving right, they seem to be too focused on maintaining the status quo and alienating progressives, and now they’re essentially complicit with a fascist regime.

    Sounds like a winning strategy to continue the move to the right and push progressive and “far-left” voices out. No wonder Bernie essentially threw Democrats under the bus in a podcast recently.


  • Michael@slrpnk.nettomemes@lemmy.worldUh, yeah. That rings a bell.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    If these countries were given the ingredients to be able to develop and there was no outside demand for mined materials, these children wouldn’t be in the mines.

    Big if, but less of an “if” if more people are made aware. It’s absolutely sickening how much we rely on lithium considering how it is sourced.

    We are collectively enabling modern slavery and child slavery. These corporations prefer to act innocent because they aren’t sending the children themselves into the mines, but they buy the materials they mine regardless (and there’s no way that they don’t know the reality). Many corporations profit off the back of these people and children and they should be required to pay significant reparations.

    What is in our power to stop this? We can spread the awareness of our exploitation of third-world countries - including their children, we can develop technologies that don’t rely on rare materials or difficult to mine materials, we can employ automation to mine what we do need in first-world countries, and we can hold the corporations that profit from these supply chains accountable.

    There are battery technologies (e.g. sodium-ion) that we could grasp and avoid mining altogether for energy storage. China is proving that sodium-ion batteries are a very promising technology, even in cars, and the sodium can be sourced from seawater or from the byproducts of desalination (the latter which likely needs to be very quickly scaled considering the fresh water crisis).



  • Michael@slrpnk.nettomemes@lemmy.worldUh, yeah. That rings a bell.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    When you put it that way, I guess we better hand over thousands every year to Apple for the new iPhone. Wouldn’t want a child slave to be unemployed.

    Buy 10,000 disposable vapes every year while you’re at it (if you really care). Maybe a couple cents will trickle down to the children you claim to care about.


  • Michael@slrpnk.nettomemes@lemmy.worldUh, yeah. That rings a bell.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    If you’re worried about these children losing their wonderful life in the mines, feel free to support them through other means.

    Make it your life’s work to spread awareness, bring aid to the affected countries, and support their development - you only enslave yourself by learning to do absolutely nothing against what you see as oppressive.

    And getting companies that profit off of these children to support them would likely be fair. Apple, Google, and many others can handle the hit.


  • Michael@slrpnk.nettomemes@lemmy.worldUh, yeah. That rings a bell.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Your trolling aside, we all share a personal responsibility to not buy from companies that e.g. utilize cobalt/lithium in their products - slavery/child labor is rampant in those supply chains and Apple et. al are responsible for supporting it.

    If there was no demand, these children wouldn’t be forced to work in mines - it’s that simple.


  • Michael@slrpnk.nettomemes@lemmy.worldUh, yeah. That rings a bell.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    You enslave others by consuming most common products on the shelves. Modern slavery (and child slavery) is more expansive than most know and third-world exploitation is rampant - western supply chains are not immune.

    While you support the enslavement of others with your consumption, corporations continue to become more and more powerful.


  • We don’t have a hate boner. We see “decentralized” being thrown around like a buzzword and we know that it really doesn’t apply to their platform.

    It’s like the Libertarian Party taking the word “libertarian” and flipping the meaning to describe their ideology.

    It’s a distortion of the spirit of the word and actual libertarians obviously want to clear up the misunderstandings that result from being introduced to the concept of libertarianism through such a group.



  • The company did not answer whether it or the outside firm it hired communicated or consulted with the Israeli military as part of its internal probe.

    In its statement, the company also conceded that it “does not have visibility into how customers use our software on their own servers or other devices.” The company added that it could not know how its products might be used through other commercial cloud providers.

    Microsoft said the Israeli military, like any other customer, was bound to follow the company’s Acceptable Use Policy and AI Code of Conduct, which prohibit the use of products to inflict harm in any way prohibited by law. In its statement, the company said it had found “no evidence” the Israeli military had violated those terms.

    Those three quotes stick out to me as proof that they are pleading ignorance.

    A military is not “like any other customer”. Forbid access and fact-find some more or stop pretending that you aren’t complicit in AI being used for harm.

    Nobody wants to live in an age of unregulated AI use besides the power-hungry and the short-sighted — and even those people probably won’t like the consequences once the boomerang comes back.

    Let’s not throw the boomerang, please. Do better.