• 4 Posts
  • 912 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 5th, 2023

help-circle










  • Liz@midwest.socialtoScience Memes@mander.xyzouch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    27 days ago

    That someone better is you. Research is always like that. If you started your project with all the knowledge you gained from doing it, it would only take you two weeks, sure, but the whole point of research is gaining that knowledge and teaching it to other people.





  • The two-party system. Regardless of where you live, if it’s under a two-party system, you probably agree that it sucks.

    Assuming we’re starting from “choose one” single-winner elections, you need to first switch your elections to Approval Voting. This would make it always safe to vote for your favorite candidate, and the full support for every losing candidate would be reflected in the vote totals. This will weaken the two party system, but no single-winner system can dismantle it.

    After that, switch as many single-winner elections to multi-winner as you can (like city council or a legislative district) and use Sequential Proportional Approval Voting to award seats. This will enable minor party candidates to get into office after the major ones, and the seat totals will look a lot closer to the vote totals.

    A few places already use approval (Fargo and St. Louis) and a few places are just begging for SPAV (Cincinnati City council).






  • That’s not what a fail-safe is. A fail-safe is just what it says: the device fails into a safe configuration. In this case, someone has to press a button to quench the magnet, which is not really a failure mode of the machine.

    A typical fail-safe is something like a solenoid valve. The valve has a default position when no power is given to the solenoid, and you should design your machine so that the default position is safe (whether that be open or closed). The most likely failure mode is a power loss, so the configuration is said to be fail-safe.