ChaoticD

Sorry you didn’t see that

The joke is, the meme template you suggested is older than the one in the post.

Ok boomer

Ah, so 55 years before the show takes place. A lot can happen to a city in that time. I also don’t see how changing the look of a city is considered woke, which is what started this post. Lol. As far as I can tell, we haven’t even seen Vault City in the trailer or in the show - yet.

Are you able to link me a screen cap of what a Brotherhood of Steel city should look like? The Fallout games I’ve played didn’t have any city that looked like it was terraformed, as far as I can remember - although the Brotherhood did have a better setup than most considering the situation. If there was a city or town, it still looked pretty badly damaged, similar to most cities in most post-apocalyptic games and shows. I tried looking it up myself, and I could only find images of aged, post apocalyptic looking, buildings. The trailer only showed a small clip, and it looked like a military base more than a city, to me…so it could be possible that they still have this city you’re talking about and we just haven’t seen it yet? So now, from my understanding, the woke factor here is that the Brotherhood doesn’t reside in a clean, advanced looking, city in the show versus the game?

It might be because I have only played a couple Fallout games so I don’t know the lore down to the specifics…but the New California Republic is based in California, and the TV series is also based in California. So how is that like saying one planet is another planet? And since it’s only 10 years after Fallout 4, I’m not surprised it looks more like Fallout 4 versus the other Fallout games.

What’s woke about the brotherhood in this series?

How exactly was it proven? Not defending Elon, I’m genuinely curious. The article mentions an audio recording sounding similar to Elon and some weird praises on Twitter. How does that connect the Dittmann account to Elon though?

I recall an article discussing this but didn’t read too much into it and it’s probably the same recent source you’re referencing that got pushed around. Did they take into account that Gen Z has a higher population of internet users than boomers, and a higher population of people in general. I mean, they’re comparing a generation of people born when the internet was a thing so they’ve been using it their entire lives, versus a generation of aged in Internet users with some who never even touched the Internet while they were alive. A generation of people with a PC in their pocket versus landline users. My boomer grandfather didn’t get scammed online because he didn’t use the internet…so Gen Z Timmy has a higher chance of being scammed than he had.