• RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can never change who your parents are, that’s some real mental gymnastics to justify how hereditary acceptance criteria is good actually, but using race to identify those underservered by k-12 education, lacking in family connections, not having knowledge of college specific tricks to getting accepted & generally having less resources available to do the extra-ciricular activity to get in, and compensate for that bias is bad.

      Affirmative action is only silly if you don’t accept that systemic racism exists.

      • escaped_cruzader@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Affirmative action is only silly if you don’t accept that systemic racism exists.

        Just because AA isn’t “silly” doesn’t mean it’s a correct policy

        Most of AA “positives” can be achieved with income-based criteria, more seats in courses and the unachievable better base education and home environment

        • RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Fine the mental gymnastics is to justify why hereditary admission criteria are more acceptable to you not “good”

          Yes the white kid does.

          • The racial biases of whoever runs the admission system
          • The racial biases of teachers at the school
          • The white kid is still more likely to benefit from hereditary admission and insider information on how to do well in admission tests/letter.

          To pretend a white kid in a predominantly black school doesn’t have an advantage in “colorblind” admissions is to deny the existence of systemic racism.

            • RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Without AA, racism in admissions is illegal.

              No positive measure to counteract systemic biases are illegal.

              Hereditary admissions when 80% of previous students were not black, is pretty explicitly racist and still very much legal

              All the implicit systemic biases in the admission system are very much legal

              The only thing you can’t do is ensure black kids get admitted.

              If you have a system and you know its giving you biases results you can compensate for the bias, without understanding every single component bias, that’s what AA was, banning it, is sticking your head in the sand and going back to faux/real Naïvity about how system racism works.

              We might as well start asking “why do black people prefer renting?”, because as a nation we are commited to pretending to not understand that there are systemic reasons for things.

              • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                when 80% of previous students were not black, is pretty explicitly racist and still very much legal

                Black people only make up 12.6% of the population. If 80% of previous students aren’t black, then black students are heavily over-represented in the student body.