Does happiness have a price? For a majority of Americans, the answer is yes — but it doesn’t come cheap.

About 6 in 10 of Americans believe money can buy happiness, according to a new poll from financial services firm Empower. Yet to achieve happiness through financial means, most people say they’d need a significant raise, as well as a big chunk of money in the bank.

Median household income in the U.S. stands at about $74,000 annually, but respondents told Empower that they’d need to earn roughly $284,000 each year to achieve happiness.

And as for wealth, Americans said they’d need even more in the bank to feel content: $1.2 million, to be exact, the poll found. Many people are wealthier than they were a few years ago, thanks to the rise in real estate and stock market values, yet the median net worth of U.S. households stood at $192,900 in 2022, according to the Federal Reserve.

  • Shelbyeileen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    10 months ago

    And yet disability is at a whopping $914/month federally and you can’t have more than $2k in your bank or they take away your food stamps and healthcare… a number that hasn’t changed since 1974 and would be $13k if adjusted for inflation. I didn’t choose to be disabled. I paid my taxes when I could work, to prevent suffering; but I’m now living with a family member and selling nudes to afford the rent, bills, vehicle costs, insurance costs, prescriptions that aren’t covered, service dog expenses, etc.

    • iamtrashman1312@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I have a disability as well, and while I am largely able to work I live in terror of taking a turn for the worse and becoming disabled. The costs are horrific and I’m just barely scraping by on what I work my ass off to make.

      Sorry, comrade, chronic illness is just ass. Hang in there

      • Shelbyeileen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        If you can make a good wage for several years before you apply, SSDI will go up and won’t be such a low average. Unfortunately, I was disabled after only a few years in the workforce and the most I made, even with a degree, was $15/hr. I wasn’t making enough for long enough to get more than the $914 (the SSI limit). That’s the best advice I can give. If you get SSDI, you’re also allowed to get married without losing benefits. Those on SSI, if married, the income the spouse makes is considered your income and is taken out of your SSI.

  • SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    $1.2 MM seems crazy to me. With one sudden influx of $200k I could pay off literally every debt I owe, and would have significantly more money than I’d spend just living normally.

    With $1.2MM I’d never have to work again, I guess maybe that’s what people are aiming for?

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      With cost of living in a lot of areas they would still need to work to afford a home, but would have a lot more flexibility and an actual expectation of being able to retire when they want to with 1.2 million.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Many people are wealthier than they were a few years ago, thanks to the rise in real estate and stock market values, yet the median net worth of U.S. households stood at $192,900 in 2022, according to the Federal Reserve.

    Isn’t this contradictory?

  • MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Something seems wrong with the result.

    To paraphrase “people that earn some money, think they need to earn 4 times as much to be happy. They have never earned that much and never will. Also, they want to save an amount that at 8% return will pay them about what they currently get paid.”

    Maybe the survey takers don’t know themselves and think more than they make now will solve things? Also, averages are likely misleading in this case.

    • coolkicks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I thought the millennial aspirations were a bit extreme, but as a millennial I get it. We had the Great Recession, outrageous prices for college, home prices are out of control.

      And I say this as a millennial doing well. We don’t even think about money day to day or paycheck to paycheck, and are saving enough to largely minimize or potentially mitigate our kids needing student loans. But I am still strategically thinking about money and what will happen when the next recession or financial calamity hits, or hyper-inflation wiping us out.

      The cost to live has been trying to outrun our income our entire adult lives, so sure, fuck it, double our income then maybe we have a chance to sleep at night even when it’s going well.

  • athos77@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Median household income in the U.S. stands at about $74,000 annually, but respondents told Empower that they’d need to earn roughly $284,000 each year to achieve happiness.

    $74k is a good wage for one person (and an okay wage for a couple) who lives in an area with a decent rental market, minimal college loans, a paid-off car, and good employer-supplied healthcare. It’s when you start factoring in the actual costs of housing, cars, college, and healthcare - or adding in the cost of kids - that things become unmanageable.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Most of America, geographically, is significantly cheaper than people often think it is.

      When you can get a 3br for $600, your median income doesn’t need to be that high. Several states have a median income in the $40s - North Dakota is in the 30s, even.

      These states are generally rural, as a rule, but they directly impact the national numbers.

      If you just pulled cities of, say, greater than 200k people, I’m sure you’d see quite different numbers.

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Most of America, geographically, is pretty far away from what people want to experience. Yes, rural is cheap, but there is a distinct lack of theater, variety of culture, and massive distances to anything other than outdoor recreation in those areas. It works for some people, but not for a lot of people.

        Not to mention the lack of high paying local jobs. Sure, it is great for a technical person who can work remote and doesn’t want to go to the clubs, but that isn’t everyone.

  • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Seems about right. I hope to retire with 2.5M in the bank. It’ll give a pretty significant income unless I live into my late 90s.

    • themeatbridge@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m hoping to send my kids to college in the next 15 years, so I don’t ever expect to retire.

  • BlackSkinnedJew@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Money can’t buy happiness but at least can buy financial education and with it you don’t will need money to be happy 🤣🤣…