• money_loo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    So then according to Steven only religion can make evil people do good, inverse law. Thoughts?

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “Inverse Law”? You do realize there’s no such thing, right?

      If a man can eat a hamburger, does the “inverse law” mean a hamburger can eat a man?

      Lemmy is wild sometimes…

      • money_loo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Okay so you don’t think religion can make evil things good, you coulda just said that.

        Was just trying to spark some conversation around the context of the statement, which itself seems silly to me on the surface.

        Cause I dunno, I’m an atheist, but I wonder if there’s ever any edge cases of religion helping people, or if you’d all rather just shit over it like we always do.

        • kromem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, religion likely was successful because in early agrarian societies having arbitrary reasons to bury the dead and burn the leftovers of butchered animals had hygiene benefits, so it brought some benefits to humanity in a given time and place.

          But maybe not the best idea to cling to obsolete ideas past the point they are beneficial, particularly when other piggybacking ideas are actively harmful.

      • money_loo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just like the original statement. Now you’re getting it.