• 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Its really really great that in a time where fascists gain more and more influence in several EU states, we also make it possible to massively spy on citizens :)

      • Random_German_Name@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Europol already said it would use it to fight „illegal migration“ and „human traffickers“ and drug dealers

        A french politian demanded to use it against „Drag Queens“ and museums

        An italian politian proposed to use chat control against „human traficking“ (in this case a dogwhistle for people, that rescue migrants), organ traffickers, illegal trading of weapons and drug dealers.

        Some important german polititians want to expand it against antisemitism, far right extremism and child pornography

        A lobbyist and another german politian want to also use it against illegally downloaded movies and music.

        https://netzpolitik.org/2023/ueberwachung-politiker-fordern-ausweitung-der-chatkontrolle-auf-andere-inhalte/ (article in german)

      • taladar@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, not the same people. The surveillance people are authoritarian fascists that have been in government parties a lot longer than the newer parties with similar views.

  • germanatlas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I want cameras and microphones in every politicians house, in every room. These record 24/7 and will be live-streamed on twitch. Any politician against this proposal is obviously a child-abusing terrorist, or do they have something even worse to hide?

    • Vivarevo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Zero privacy to world leaders and absolute privacy to citizen would be ideal.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fourthly, scanning for known, thus old material does not help identify and rescue victims, or prevent child sexual abuse. It will actually make safeguarding victims more difficult by pushing criminals to secure, decentralised communication channels which are impossible to intercept even with a warrant.

    This point is huge, and on its own explains why half baked compromises are worthless.

    The criminals will use banned chat apps, while innocent people get their messages read.

    • taladar@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The reason they don’t care about that is that the whole thing isn’t about protecting children at all but about surveillance of the vast majority of people.

    • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well that’s the point, catching CSAM is just a very convenient excuse. Once that’s through, it will just be a matter of extending it to terrorism. Then you can declare anyone a terrorist and bam you have free reign to monitor anyone you want.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lol guess we can kiss post-quantum TLS goodbye.

    This is going to have catastrophically negative effects for the internet in general. And, as others have said, actual bad actors will just keep using the most advanced encryption available anyways. This only makes the vast majority of internet users less secure and easier targets for exploitation.