1110101010101@reddthat.com to Cool Guides@lemmy.caEnglish · 1 year agoA cool guide to photographersreddthat.comimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up129arrow-down12
arrow-up127arrow-down1imageA cool guide to photographersreddthat.com1110101010101@reddthat.com to Cool Guides@lemmy.caEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squaremagikmw@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoCalling low grain higher quality is like throwing a tool out because you don’t know what it’s for.
minus-squareIronKrill@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoCan you explain the difference then? I turn up ISO when I have to for low-light, but agree with the guide that the grain looks worse. I understand you may want stylistic grain, but I generally want clear photos and grain isn’t that.
Calling low grain higher quality is like throwing a tool out because you don’t know what it’s for.
Can you explain the difference then? I turn up ISO when I have to for low-light, but agree with the guide that the grain looks worse. I understand you may want stylistic grain, but I generally want clear photos and grain isn’t that.