• Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    For fighting pedos (or abusers in general) it would be way more helpful to fight it at the root, not the leafs.

    But it’s just a marketing-phrase to kill privacy, not fight abuse…

  • magnetosphere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, a better title might be “Fighting privacy under the guise of fighting pedophelia: The EU rule that could break the internet”

  • Gakomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not gonna lie the fighting pedophilia seems more of an excuse in order to read our messages!

  • deczzz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    And it will probably happen. No one in power gives a fuck about logic and reason. It’s all about sending a signal. People don’t care about privacy but they don’t like pedos!

    11 years ago, I attended a talk by Gottfrid Svartholm in Berlin. He told us that we have lost the internet. Pretty good foresight eh?

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Taking away privacy makes it easier for children to be abused.

    Remember, the most likely abusers of children are not strangers off the Internet; they’re people who have authority over those children: parents, church leaders, teachers, coaches, police, etc.

    Private online communication makes it easier for abused children to get help.

    In other words, these laws are not “fighting pedophilia”. They are enabling child abuse.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pedophiles would be terminally stupid if they used common, commercial chat systems and social media. Those who survive have probably their own forums completely disconnected from commercial prying eyes.

    So in the end they would only catch a handful of very stupid amateurs while trampling on the rights to privacy and confidentiality of all citizens.

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Totally fair hahaha.

          I gotta hand it to Apple for being one of the very few mega corpos that even try to advocate for privacy. Their idea of “scan your photos” was fucked, but at least they backpedaled. I’d like to hope it was a checksum scan and not, like, an AI scan that had human reviewers—that would be incredibly creepy to me.

          Well, I don’t store any photos on iCloud anyway cuz I don’t need the fucked up shit I do with my partner on the interwebs, but still. Not a good look, glad they went back on it.