The bartender asks “Do all three of you want a beer?”
The first logician says “I don’t know”.
The second logician says “I don’t know.”
The third logician says “Yes.”
You must log in or register to comment.
For this joke to logically work, logicians must be weird people who always know whether they want a beer or not. Because if it happened that the first guy just hadn’t made his mind up yet, then the third guy’s conclusion could be wrong.
They all had made up their mind. You don’t need to know the others decision to answer No to the question, but you do to say yes. If the first didn’t want a beer they could definitively answer no. They did, but didn’t know the others decisions so couldn’t say yes. Same with the 2nd. The third could say yes because he knew the other two didn’t say no, so whatever they wanted was the answer
OCs point was that if the first person hadn’t made up their mind yet, that would also cause them to say “i don’t know”, but the two following logicians seem to assume that the first person said “i don’t know” because they wanted it but didn’t know if the other two did
It’s a false dichotomy and faulty logic if you look too closely
But it’s a pretty funny joke
If he has not made a mind, he does not want bear. He might want bear few moments later, but at the moment of answering the question, he does not. That’s what my logic tells me.
Hmm, that’s true, if the question is if all three in this moment wants a beer, then not knowing if you want it means that you don’t currently want it in the strictest sense 🤔
This is a good point, but I’ll move the goalposts very slightly and suggest that human brains are capable of wanting something without knowing that they want something. For example, if you say you don’t know whether you want a beer, and then the person next to you orders a beer, then at that moment, you might realize that you really did want a beer before.
It’s been shown that your brain makes it’s decision several seconds before your consciousness is aware of it.
So, it just takes a second for the Ego to catch up with the Id
First guy knows he wants a beer, but doesn’t know if the others do, so says he doesn’t know if all three do. However, if he had not wanted a beer, he would have known that not all three wanted one, and therefore would have said no. Which means the second guy then knows that the first guy wants a beer, but does not know if the third does. So he says he doesn’t know. That gives the third guy, who also wants a beer, with enough information to say that all three want a beer
Logicians are weird people.
That’s just illogical!
logicians must be weird people who always know whether they want a beer or not.
Don’t you think you should have made up your mind at that point when the barkeeper asks you? :-)
At least when it says logicians, I expect them to know. Weird people are the others, those who don’t know.
If any logician hadn’t made up his mind, then the answer to “do all of you want a beer” would be False, i. e. No.
The idea that a Yes/No question can have any other state is not possible for these cartoonish logicians.
(Of course, “logicians” do not exist. The closest thing in real life are mathematicians and computer scientists who are trained in logic, and these people known that the real world works differently than the simple logic presented in this joke, so your point is valid at some level, but it doesn’t invalidate the joke)
“logicians” do not exist
Well, then, what would you call a professor of logic?
Logicians certainly do exist. Some of them might be called mathematicians or philosophers but that doesn’t mean they’re not logicians.
none of them would go to a bar if they didn’t mean to consume some drink – therefore we can assume all of them knew whether they wanted a beer or not.
No? Have you never been in a group of drinkers while staying sober yourself. Heck, have you never even met such a person?
There are non-alcoholic drinks in bars too.
I find It pretty funny told my high school teacher this joke once and he looked at me really weird hahaha.
