• Baleine@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Deb files are debian packages, so if you’re not on debian you can’t install it

        • tslnox@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m on Gentoo for example. I can write an ebuild to automatically download said deb, extract it, install it with the package manager… And if the site has any semblance of organization involved, I can write one ebuild that will always download the version specified in its name, so when there is an update, I can copy the ebuild, change its name to new version and if the dependencies or structure didn’t change, it will install just fine without any work.

          • Genericusername@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I am quite comfortable finding my way around ArchLinux, and recently decided to give Gentoo a try. I didn’t expect it to be that much harder but all the cflags, emerge, conflicts and updates feels like black magic. I guess that if you know your way around Gentoo, reverse-engineering a deb file is not a real challenge. However I’m assuming that most Linux users would hope for a less involved solution.

        • Lime66@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago
          • Incredibly old and likely no longer updated packages
          • the devs are expected to backport their security fixes to these packages, which can create an outrageous amount of work

          I don’t understand why would people not be on debian does not compute

          I don’t understand why someone would want to be on Debian, what actual advantage does it have.

          • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Stability, slow changes, predictable, strong history, lots of distributions are based on it, the list goes on and on. I don’t use it but it’s kinda stupid to question it’s relevant qualities considering how much it’s brought to the Linux community.

          • molochthagod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Relax, guys, Debian and not Debian both have their pros and cons. The variety of options is what’s so beautiful about Linux.

      • LeFantome@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        If it is only available as a .deb, it is probably targeting Ubuntu specifically.

        Ubuntu is a derivative of Debian and uses the same package format. Ubuntu is much more popular though and the packages are not completely compatible.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If it is only available as a .deb, it is probably targeting Ubuntu specifically.

          Did you mean versus another Debian derivative like PopOS, or versus a non-Debian derivative like Fedora, etc.?