• Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    My mention of Shanghai was how they have a horrible ruling class, that has implemented a Social Credit Score. Do or say something they don’t like? No more taking the train out of the city. People become bound to the zone they are designated. Sounds a little dystopian no?

    The large single houses thing is not true either, I live in Canada and my neighborhood has big corps sweeping through buying properties and building cookie cutter condos in place of the houses. Many don’t even have parking

    • mondoman712@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a lot you could criticise about the Chinese government, and yet you choose more conspiracy theories. The social credit score in the way that you speak of it comes from a misunderstanding of a vaguely worded Chinese policy document, which lead to various pilot projects by some companies, cities and ministries which have all been conflated into one thing. Here’s a good video which goes over the whole thing which I’m sure you won’t watch but will still have many opinions about.

      The issue you describe in Canada is part of the problem that I describe. Here’s a zoning map of Vancouver for example:

      In all of the yellow areas, only single family homes and duplexes can be built, which have very low densities. This means anytime there is space where something more dense can be built, the most dense thing possible is built. If there was less restrictive zoning which allowed more mixed uses across the area, what’s known as missing middle housing, that is all of the other housing types in between single family homes and large condo towers, could be built.

      • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thank you for enlightening me on the Social Credit Score, it’s good to know it’s only court ordered in cases where people aren’t allowed to take the train or fly. That’s still not great though. I work under some (overly nepotistic) execs for a corp and they use similar vague style tactics. It’s honestly both a weapon and a shield that leaves the players powerless and the game masters with too much control. I wouldn’t want a country run this way.

        I also think of people like Xu Xiaodong who had his score reduced to “D” until he paid $40,000USD for calling a fake martial artist a fraud ಠ_ಠ. The courts in China are another discussion though. I’m just saying there is too much room for weaponization in scenarios like this. If it can be exploited, it will.

        The missing middle housing stuff does look interesting, and I see your point with it. If it doesn’t impede peoples sunlight or take away yards/gardens while mixing buildings like that, it might be a good solution that we could agree on.