• MooseBoys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    the fact that all morals are made up

    You’re starting from the basic axiom of moral relativism. A moral absolutist would disagree with this axiom.

    • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And all I would have to do would be reference the multitudes of cultures across the earth and through time that have vastly differing morals.

      • MooseBoys@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        A moral absolutist would argue that most, or even all, are wrong in one way or another. One can be a moral absolutist without claiming to be able to evaluate the morality of any particular scenario.

        To provide an analogous example, there is a two-player game called Hex for which it has been proven that there exists a dominant strategy for the first player, but a generalized winning strategy is unsolved. One can soundly assert that such a strategy exists without knowing what it is. Likewise, its not fundamentally invalid to assert that there exist absolute moral truths without knowing what they are.