personally I hate what they did to the distro plus all the other branches like CentOS and redhat.
at this point I’m all out from Fedora. I was a pretty hardcore Fedora fanboy before IBM, but they made it abundantly clear that an open Linux is counter to their goals and that’s why I’m out.
I have even flipped my whole selfhost stack from 100% Fedora/CentOS to Debian.
You can keep using them, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they pull the rug out from under you in the next couple years under “licensing” changes.
Totally reasonable argument you have presented. I don’t personally feel like there will be licensing changes, but if I’m wrong, I will definitely consider Debian when I switch!
Fedoras better but I guess I respect your opinion
Hey, Fedora is great! I just prefer it!
Fedora is fine, and mine runs on a vm in a hypervisor on a rickety table on a faultline so it tips pretty regularly.
They soured me a little when they forked redhat and made me go to fedora on the desktop, shame on me.
They right fucked me when they privatized Centos.
Truth is they’re fine, but I hate them all the same now, they cost me months of work.
IBM can suck my ass.
I don’t see my use of Fedora as supporting IBM, some will shame me but I don’t do bug reports or share any info.
personally I hate what they did to the distro plus all the other branches like CentOS and redhat.
at this point I’m all out from Fedora. I was a pretty hardcore Fedora fanboy before IBM, but they made it abundantly clear that an open Linux is counter to their goals and that’s why I’m out.
I have even flipped my whole selfhost stack from 100% Fedora/CentOS to Debian.
You can keep using them, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they pull the rug out from under you in the next couple years under “licensing” changes.
Totally reasonable argument you have presented. I don’t personally feel like there will be licensing changes, but if I’m wrong, I will definitely consider Debian when I switch!