The Duolingo owl’s long lost cousin makes a difference.
Pretty sure it’s Woodsy Owl
Both can be true
Given the context, highly unlikely
In Germany: Sticking oneself to the road with insta-glue -> People call you a climate-terrorist Almost makes you wish for REAL Eco-Terror, so people can differentiate what public disobedience is and what terrorism is.
It’s definitely also not having children.
Kinda defeats the point of saving the climate for our kids, if there’s no kids. A rapidly greying population is also less able to actively mitigate climate change.
I would say most activists fights for wildlife rather than kids.
I am not having children, but I am very invested in saving our planet for other people’s children
Or like… have one, instead of 50. Or God forbid you adopt.
Aunts and Uncles (genetic or not) are of huge benefit to children. maybe you don’t have kids. But if your best friend has a kid and you become Uncle Meow for that kid, you’ve just increased the security and stability of that kid’s life. You now are another adult in their life who can protect that kid from social and financial disasters.
Maybe the way to look at it is “we all have fewer kids, and invest ourselves in the welfare of the kids around us.”
Based.
if I were an oil refinery worker, what sneaky trick could I pull to irreversibly clog up the machinery?
