• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I disagree. It may seem that way if that’s all you look at and/or you buy the BS coming from the LLM hype machine, but IMO it’s really no different than the leap to the internet or search engines. Yes, we open ourselves up to a ton of misinformation, shifting job market etc, but we also get a suite of interesting tools that’ll shake themselves out over the coming years to help improve productivity.

    It’s a big change, for sure, but it’s one we’ll navigate, probably in similar ways that we’ve navigated other challenges, like scams involving spoofed webpages or fake calls. We’ll figure out who to trust and how to verify that we’re getting the right info from them.

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      LLMs are not like the birth of the internet. LLMs are more like what came after when marketing took over the roadmap. We had AI before LLMs, and it delivered high quality search results. Now we have search powered by LLMs and the quality is dramatically lower.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Sure, and we had an internet before the world wide web (ARPANET). But that wasn’t hugely influential until it was expanded into what’s now the Internet. And that evolved into the world wide web after 20-ish years. Each step was a pretty monumental change, and built on concepts from before.

        LLMs are no different. Yes they’re built on older tech, but that doesn’t change the fact that they’re a monumental shift from what we had before.

        Let’s look at access to information and misinformation. The process was something like this:

        1. Physical encyclopedias, newspapers, etc
        2. Digital, offline encyclopedias and physical newspapers
        3. Online encyclopedias and news
        4. SEO and the rise of blog/news spam - misinformation is intentional or negligent
        5. Early AI tools - misinformation from hallucinations is largely also accidental
        6. Misinformation in AI tools becomes intentional

        We’re in the transition from 5 to 6, which is similar to the transition from 3 to 4. I’m old enough to have seen each of these transitions.

        The way people interact with the world is fundamentally different now than it was before LLMs came out, just like the transition from offline to online computing. And just like people navigated the transition to SEO nonsense, people need to navigate he transition to LLM nonsense. It’s quite literally a paradigm shift.

        • zbyte64@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 minutes ago

          Enshittification is a paradigm shift, but not one we associate with the birth of the internet.

          On to your list. Why does misinformation appear after the birth of the internet? Was yellow journalism just a historical outlier?

          What you’re witnessing is the “Red Queen hypothesis”. LLMs have revolutionized the scam industry and step 7 is an AI arms race against and with misinformation.