• rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    The nutritional stuff is like 6th-grade science, about the time you should be burning peanuts with a Bunsen burner.

    I’ve seen a few schools that have an elective financials class, but I think they’re still trying to balance checkbooks.

    The problem is it’s just one class, and nobody takes classes seriously in high school. Most of them have forgotten the things that they used to know when they were 20, 30, or even 40 years past their education.

    It’s like we need some kind of driver’s ed test but for living

    edit: 6th grade, no fire in elementary school

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I have never been invited to burn peanuts with a bunsen burner. Showing the relationship between chemical energy and thermal energy and the sometimes surprising differences between foods?

      I think we had too much separation between diet classes and physical science. I think I recall doing something like a puzzle, with physical pieces, where you tried to make a days food using different foods. The point was that it’s easier and you get more if you pick the healthier foods. Instead everyone knew what the point was and then fucked around making the dumbest possible meal that fit the defined criteria.
      I seem to recall the teacher not being amused with my solution that only has one food group per meal. (What’s for breakfast? 9 eggs. Lunch? 3 unseasoned grilled chicken breasts. Dinner? Six baked potatos, plain)