• SaladKing@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 minutes ago

    This is exactly what social media companies have been doing for a while (it’s free, yes) they use your data to train their algorithms to squeeze more money out of people. They get a tangible and monetary benefit from our collective data. These AI companies want to train their AI on our hard work and then get monetary benefit off of it. How is this not seen as theft or even if they are not doing it just yet…how is it not seen as an attempt at theft?

    How come people (not the tech savvy) are unable to see how they are being exploited? These companies are not currently working towards any UBI bills or policies in governments that I am aware of. Since they want to take our work, and use it to get rich and their investors rich why do they think they are justified in using people’s work? It just seems so slime-y.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    No, actually they’ve just finally admitted that they can’t improve them any further because there’s not enough training data in existence to squeeze any more demonizing returns out of.

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The only way this would be ok is if openai was actually open. make the entire damn thing free and open source, and most of the complaints will go away.

  • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Business that stole everyone’s information to train a model complains that businesses can steal information to train models.

    Yeah I’ll pour one out for folks who promised to open-source their model and then backed out the moment the money appeared… Wankers.

  • psyspoop@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    ·
    9 hours ago

    But I can’t pirate copyrighted materials to “train” my own real intelligence.

    • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      That’s because the elites don’t want you to think for yourself, and instead are designing tools that will tell you what to think.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Now you get why we were all told to hate AI. It’s a patriot act for copywrite and IP laws. We should be able too. But that isn’t where our discussions were steered was it

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It’s copyright, not copywrite—you know, the right to copy. Copywriting is what ad people do. And what does this have to do with the PATRIOT Act?

    • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      8 hours ago

      you can, however, go to your local library and read any book ever written for free

  • Teknikal@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Apparantly their trying to get Deepseek banned again, really doesn’t like competition this guy.

  • rageagainstmachines@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    11 hours ago

    “We can’t succeed without breaking the law. We can’t succeed without operating unethically.”

    I’m so sick of this bullshit. They pretend to love a free market until it’s not in their favor and then they ask us to bend over backwards for them.

    Too many people think they’re superior. Which is ironic, because they’re also the ones asking for handouts and rule bending. If you were superior, you wouldn’t need all the unethical things that you’re asking for.