Everybody loves Wikipedia, the surprisingly serious encyclopedia and the last gasp of Old Internet idealism!

(90 seconds later)

We regret to inform you that people write credulous shit about “AI” on Wikipedia as if that is morally OK.

Both of these are somewhat less bad than they were when I first noticed them, but they’re still pretty bad. I am puzzled at how the latter even exists. I had thought that there were rules against just making a whole page about a neologism, but either I’m wrong about that or the “rules” aren’t enforced very strongly.

  • David Gerard@awful.systemsM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    acronym-spouting rules lawyers who will crush dissent by a thousand duck nibbles

    hey now, my duck nibbling is thoroughly weaponised