As thousands of people remain unable to leave the Burning Man festival in the Nevada desert after heavy rains inundated their campsites with ankle-deep mud Saturday, authorities say they are investigating a death at the event.

Attendees were told to shelter in place in the Black Rock Desert and conserve food, water and fuel after a rainstorm swamped the area, forcing officials to halt any entering or leaving of the festival.

The remote area in northwest Nevada was hit with 2 to 3 months worth of rain – up to 0.8 inches – in just 24 hours between Friday and Saturday mornings. The heavy rainfall fell on dry desert grounds, whipping up thick, clay-like mud that festivalgoers say is too difficult to walk or bike through.

  • underisk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If 100k isn’t rich to you then you have lived an exceptionally blessed life. Also “more than” doesn’t mean all of them are making exactly 100k

      • underisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tell that to people making less than 30k and describe the look they give you

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          As one of those people you are presuming to speak for, no, I wouldn’t consider 100k rich. I find that to be an absurd statement.

    • socsa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bro, median household income in the US is almost $80k. It’s not 1998 anymore.

    • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      True for one person but this is household income. A married couple both making $50k would fall into this. While that is definitely not poor by any means. I think it is fair to say that it would be a bit of a stretch to call a person in the us today making $50k “rich.”

        • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What do you mean? The article that was pulling the data used “household income” as the data set… It is exclusively talking about household income.

          • underisk@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah I went back and checked. Wrong about that, but I’d like to reiterate that 100k is simply the lower bound of the range provided. It does not mean that any or even a majority of them were making exactly 100k per household. In fact, 15% are listed as 300k which is more than the amount of people attending making less than 30k. Then you also have to consider that households that do make 100k are far more likely to have single-income earners than households only making 50k.