I found this channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GULvtVCe-I and I’m going to post the screenshots below. The video has links in the description which prove the screenshots are genuine. For clarification, the 20 year old knew the 14 year old was 14 prior to these comments being made.
T, the person with the green avatar and geometric name, says that the pedophile allegation is slander, because people can’t speak for another person’s intentions and people are interpreting those comments the wrong way.
I’m trying to get an unbiased judgment of these comments here. is there any other way those comments T posted could be interpreted?
Yeah noncery is afoot, Triagonal is acting like a creepy crawly cradle-robber
No, she (an adult) is weirdly obsessed with a boy (a MINOR) 6 years younger than him. This is effing disgusting and I can’t interpret it any other way. Her wanting to be shipped (which is typically a ROMANTIC pairing) with this boy coupled with wanting to go on a double date with him (“dates” can technically be platonic but not in this context) is weird and definitely romantic.
I’m 24 and wouldn’t even date someone 6 years younger despite them being technically legal. For me it’s 20+, but FREAKING 14!?
What was the calculation again?
20/2 + 7 = 17, he’s literally below the date range calculation.
And arguable you change so much between 15 and 20, I always hated the thought of dating a 19yo at 23. This is way off.
Oh my God, this MF has a Lemmy account…
What she is requesting is sexual depictions of a minor. Depending on how it’s drawn that is probably illegal in the US.
She could request anything, but she requests a sexual depictions of a minor, even though she probably knows that it’s most likely illegal.
If it’s unethical, there’s room for argument I guess. But this goes further, and usually if something violates a law, in most cases we’re past the ethical debate and straight into criminal prosecution territory.
TL;DR there’s no other way to view this.
Removed by mod
