• pelikan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Literally the same words said in December 2021 could possibly prevent:

    • invasion of Ukraine;
    • death of dozens or hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians and turning of millions of Ukrainians to refugees;
    • destruction of dozens of Ukrainian cities;
    • loss of Ukrainian territory to Russia;
    • loss of Ukrainian rare minerals to US.

    The Trump administration is just saying loud what all the other NATO governors have been hiding. No one ever planned to fight Russia for Ukraine and the only destiny for Ukrainian aboriginals is to be used as proxy cannon fodder to fight one of NATO’s bogeymen.

    NATO countries never cared about Ukraine’s casualities to the point that they decided that Ukrainian lives were worth less than a signed piece of paper with the aforementioned statement: ‘No NATO for Ukraine’. Everything that happens to the people of Ukraine is just collateral damage on the way to the main goal – to harm Russia. The colonizer mentality (so well known to many NATO countries) never changes.

  • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Security guarantees? Europe’s picking up the tab while Washington cashes out. Hegseth’s “pragmatic evaluation” means funneling Europe’s GDP into Lockheed Martin’s quarterly reports. NATO’s 5% defense spending target? A $2.3 trillion shakedown disguised as collective security. The Continent’s industrial base is now a Pentagon subcontractor.

    Crimea’s gone. Zelensky’s bargaining chips? A lithium deposit map and a graveyard of Leopard tanks. The “non-NATO peacekeeping mission” is just a rebrand for EU cannon fodder patrols. Von der Leyen’s already drafting memos about “volunteer brigades” staffed by unemployed Iberian welders.

    The real “negotiated settlement”: Trump’s Mar-a-Lago membership roster now includes Rosneft executives. Europe gets to foot the bill for demining Donbas while Chevron drills the Black Sea.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      The fact that Europeans bet their whole future on a politically unstable country that can completely change its entire policy every four years will never stop being hilarious.

      • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Europe’s gamble isn’t just hilarious; it’s tragicomic. Hitching your entire geopolitical wagon to a nation that treats foreign policy like a reality TV show is less strategy and more roulette. Every election cycle, Europe braces for the next wildcard—will it be isolationism or interventionism? Nobody knows, least of all the Americans.

        Meanwhile, the EU’s “unity” is a patchwork quilt of conflicting interests, stitched together with bureaucratic duct tape. Betting on stability from across the Atlantic while your own house is on fire? That’s not foresight; it’s delusion.

        The real punchline? Europe bankrolls this circus while Washington reaps the dividends. At this rate, they might as well start paying for campaign ads in Iowa.

  • tiredturtle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    Under this deal, Putin gets to annex key territories while Ukraine is kept out of NATO and left without American peacekeepers, forcing Europe to buy U.S. military gear. Imperialist powers divide and weaken working people by keeping nations in chaos and under constant threat. This brief period of “peace” isn’t for long as capitalist interests allow Russia to regroup and rearm. Ukraine remains in a disordered, free-for-all state under imperialist influences. In time, this setup could let Russia launch an invasion through Odessa to connect with Transnistria.

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Transnistria is a thousand miles from Odessa, twice as far as St. Petersberg, and Pskov is about 400 miles away.

      Vibes, vibes, vibes.

      • tiredturtle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Transnistria is a thousand miles from Odessa, twice as far as St. Petersberg, and Pskov is about 400 miles away.

        Vibes, vibes, vibes.

        No. The material reality is that Transnistria is roughly 100–150 km from Odessa and not the thousand miles being claimed.

        Pskov is near the Estonian border, and St. Petersburg is on the Baltic Sea. Neither of these cities is close to Moldova, so they are largely irrelevant to any invasion plans in that region.

        It’s important to rely on concrete conditions and verifiable data rather than hyperbolic claims and vibing.

  • Grapho@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    Get ready to see a wave of far right terrorist attacks on US/European soil when they realize what we’ve been ridiculed for saying from day one: they were used as cannon fodder, there was never any intention of NATO membership

  • Tyrangle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Wouldn’t this have had value as a bargaining chip in peace talks? The fact that they’re saying this now suggests that they’re about to pressure Ukraine into a truly shitty deal.

    • StalinIsMaiWaifu@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 days ago

      My guess is that this was Putin’s requirement to even discuss terms. Besides, Trump already secured rights to their REM, what more could we even get from Ukraine joining NATO?

  • NikkiB@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    “He deserves special gratitude from the Ukrainian and European establishments for telling the truth before things go way too far.”

    Before??

    • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      Nuclear war helps nobody. Hegseth doesn’t have an option here, nor does anyone in the West. They tried to push their nuclear capabilities to the last border and Russia stopped them. When the only further option is escalating towards nuclear war, then you really don’t have options. Hegseth, the media talking head that he is, has been tasked with communicating the reality on the ground, not making any real decisions here