Specifically a rule banning it so we don’t get defederated, coupled with a clarification about what it means to fall under this category.

I’m thinking of situations like characters that look underage but canonically aren’t (i.e. the 1000 year old loli trope) and characters that are drawn indistinguishably from adults but are canonically underage.

  • Sentiel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Here’s a picture of Jotaro Kujo cosplaying as a Diglet, who was 17 at the time.

    Doesn’t look at all as your typical 17 year old but then againi it’s JoJo.

    All I’m saying that it can be sometimes difficult to distinguish what is ok and what isn’t but I’m in favour of not having anything underage anywhere on the internet.

    • UprisingVoltage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Imo it’s pretty easy to distinguish what is ok and what is not

      It’s a child if:

      • they look like a child
      • they behave like a chilid

      Idfc if your dragon loli has the knowledge of the world before humans existed. If she looks and behave like a child, they’re a chilid. People who create those characters know it, people turned on by them know it.

      Sexualizing children, both boys and girls, it’s wrong. Please let’s ban these kind of posts, they can create a pedo instance or some shit if they’re really into it

      • RestfulD34m0N@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We are working to find a solution everyone can agree on, where we dont have to ban things like hentai with small breasts, etc. while still hitting the root problem. In the meantime we’re using our discretion to remove posts that look underage