How do I free my television?

  • DontMakeMoreBabies@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Nvidia shields with an alternate home screen have been a good solution for me? TV isn’t connected to the network directly, just to the shield.

    I’ve got RetroArch, Plex, Spotify on each of them - that sort of stuff.

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      bingo. never put the tv on the network, just budget for adding something else. tvs have been known to update after a year and start injecting ads outside return policy LOL. fucking scam’s man. my shield fucks up, it get flashed. or traded out.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yeah I use a GoogleTV and don’t let the set itself connect to the internet. I held onto an HTPC as long as I could but it just got too troublesome to coax high quality streams out of it after a while.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yes, something like that would work. The stock OS would still be on the TV but as long as you don’t connect the TV to WiFi it should be fine.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    What I did was bought a “commercial” television that’s intended to either be put in a waiting room and tuned to Fox News all day, OR used as digital signage. It’s not quite an Arby’s menu board because it’s still obviously a television, has a tuner and such, but it has no “smart” TV in it and the backlight isn’t as “won’t survive a run of Breath of the Wild” like the TCL televisions my parents own. Then I slapped a Raspberry Pi 4 on the back with OSMC on it. Meanwhile I did replace my small form factor desktop gaming rig, so I have a Ryzen 3600/GTX1080 rig sitting unplugged under that television waiting for me to build up the gumption to switch over to it.

  • oo1@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’d think most people woud go for a cheap used ultra Small Form Factor pc or raspberry pi set up as an htpc. Plug in to either tv screen (via hdmi ) or monitor / projector directly. Never connect the tv to the internet - or even to your LAN if you’re really paranoid. You can arse around with a remote control a bit bodgy, or just use wireless Keyboard/mouse.

    I cant imagine spending the time to jailbreak a tv to get less functionality for more hassle - but i’m sure some crazy will have done it - good luck finding them though.

  • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    i’m in the EU. if i order a screen/panel that can do tv or is smart i pay more on import taxes. so the obvious is to buy the dumbest panel you can get and slap some SBC on it yourself. still want to use cable and sat? tv headend is just great for that amd more as you can mix cable, sat and ip tv. your sbc (or nuc etc) can run stuff like kodi and you’re good to go. you still want android apps for a tv? go add some cheap fire tv stick. i dont know of any droid app i still would need. used to have “pluto” but turns out thats just boring too.

  • Gemini24601@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    This would be awesome, but something else I thought of would be DRM. If you don’t have the correct version (like Linux and a few android custom roms) then you would stream at really low quality. So if you even came up with a free smart tv os, it would lack quality streaming

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    162
    ·
    14 hours ago

    It should be a thing because most (all?) “smart TVs” run some variety of Linux, which, as Free Software, is supposed to guarantee the device owner’s right to modify the software running on the thing. However, in most (all?) cases, the practical ability to do that has been destroyed by subverting encryption functions against the owner in a process called Tivoization.

    In other words:

    1. No, it isn’t really a thing,
    2. It’s wrong for it not to be a thing, and
    3. You should be pissed off about it.
    • chingadera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Woah woah woah, slow down partner, you’re not done yet.

      1. you should absolutely make as much headway on this project as you can, then share the results so we can all benefit.
      • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I mean, they did it with phones too. Android is just Linux. That was one of the main attractions, for me at least.

        At first, many people and groups supplied their own phone OSes. There was a whole thriving community ecosystem. Then they started to make it really hard, locking bootloaders and including critical pieces of hardware that didn’t or couldn’t have open source drivers (look up WinModems for a very early example of this technique, it remains really effective) or otherwise required extremely convoluted methods to access and the phone might function marginally without some of these fully functional, but at least you could still install a custom ROM on it if you were stubborn enough.

        But even that wouldn’t last. Nowadays they’ve made it literally impossible to defeat the security on most phones, in the name of keeping hackers and criminals out, but really a big part of their motivation is blocking these pirate OSes that let you actually control the hardware and software in your phone, doing criminally nefarious things like stopping them from downloading ads (the horror!) and preventing them from funneling all your data and activities back to Big Brother (how rude!) and worst of all updating it with modern functionality after they’ve declared it “obsolete”. The goal going forward is to sell you things that you don’t and can’t control, so they can shut them down or make them gradually more and more useless and make you buy new ones forever. They want you to have a subscription for everything including physical objects without realizing that you’ve been forced to subscribe to their regularly-scheduled-disposable-device-replacement-plan for no actual reason.

        They’re coming for computers too, or at least they’ll try. They want control of everything we interact with. For profit, mostly, but I wouldn’t rule out other motives. It’s a powerful thing when you have control of everything people see and do.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I could be wrong (I haven’t really paid attention lately), but I think the state of Linux on “smart” TVs is considerably more dire than the state of Android phones. At least with the latter, projects like LineageOS and GrapheneOS are a thing, whereas I know of zero third-party community firmware projects for TVs.

    • rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It’s interesting to see some of the back-and-forth on this topic between different proponents of free software.

      I listened to this talk by Linus Torvalds a while back and it relates to the GPL license used by the Linux kernel and why the kernel hasn’t changed to GPLv3. Apparently Linus doesn’t find this practice by Tivo and other hardware manufacturers to be an issue.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yes, it’s a damn shame that Linus is weak on property rights.

        Because that’s what this actually is, by the way: violating the device owner’s property rights in order to prioritize the manufacturer’s temporary monopoly privilege over the software – which was only created for the sole and express purpose “to promote the progress of science and the useful arts” in the first place – above them.

          • oo1@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I think he needs to work with HW manufacturers and chip designers/manufacturers to get drivers. They’re always going to have some proprietary HW and FW and communication protocols somewhere in their stuff. I think if he pisses them off too much he has to to bit-bash or reverse engineer all drivers for loads of stuff - which is never going to happen.

  • pyrflie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Yes, it’s called jailbreaking. That said it basically never happens because TV’s are pretty much shitty monitors with cheap digital encoders, and you can buy an encoder and a good monitor for way way cheaper than rewriting an OS.

    • Azzu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They simply don’t exist anymore. The only choice is to do this with a smart TV and never connect it to the internet.

    • ABCDE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I’m not sure they exist, but either way, just plug something in and don’t connect the TV itself to the internet.

      • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Sceptre has some dumb TVs. You can also still get the display TVs that companies use. I’m drunk so I forget what they’re called.

        • ABCDE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Oh that’s a point, probably not cheap though, maybe not good for home cinema? Not heard of Sceptre, will check out. I’m happy just not connecting my TV mind you.

          • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Sceptre is cheapo stuff. And at least one brand of smart TV is wardriving to find networks behind your back (again, drunk, I can’t remember which right now) and creating mesh networks with other TVs of the same type.

              • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Learned skill. I spend a lot of time drunk and Android tends to do a pretty good job of guessing what I’m swiping.

                I also tend to reread what I wrote when I’m drunk. I actually generally do a worse job sober because I won’t double check my work.

                And it was signage displays for the dumb TVs I was thinking of, and Sharp TVs used to have unsecured wireless networks that you couldn’t really turn off, so they’d make a mesh with other smart TVs. I believe I’ve heard the same thing about Samsung as well.

                Now it’s time to go jog myself sick.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    In principle, yes, and I believe a few small hobby projects have attempted to do this and support specific TVs. However, interest in developing a custom Smart TV platform tends to get siphoned away into a project where the output from your actual platform is displayed on the TV rather than running directly on it. Simply, it’s easier to develop and maintain support across different models.

    Why would you develop a custom TV OS that runs on one TV when you could develop it for any mini PC and immediately support all TVs? You’d have to develop your OS to run on each specific TV model which will make it quite hard to reach a critical mass sufficient to attract attention from developers and users alike.

    The juice isn’t really worth the squeeze. It’s not like TV vendors are publishing detailed hardware specs and drivers. Writing or even porting an OS is hard. Look at the state of the Android ROM scene, and that’s about as good as it gets when some vendors are actually attempting to open source their drivers. The difficulty is much higher and the interest lower due to the existence of a viable alternative.

    With that said, motivated minds have done it anyway. You just need to have the right TV for it.

  • BossDj@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Usually that means trying to get Android TV working through USB, but it depends on what tv you have. If you already have an Android TV, just use a launcher like Projectivy. Most people just buy a media box: either an Android based one or apple tv and disable the “smart” tv altogether

    • JohnWorks@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I’d imagine you could probably get into the android developer settings and disable all the telemetry stuff through adb and install a custom launcher like projectivity and that’d be the closest you could get to running a custom tv OS at least if you can’t flash it.

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    15 hours ago

    It’s much easier to run a HTPC on something small like a Raspberry Pi, or an NVIDIA Shield. The hardware on your TV is probably the bare minimum to run its own smart features, and replacing the firmware doesn’t guarantee that the TV isn’t still phoning home with your data.