• dwindling7373@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Absolutely not. It’s the other way around there’s a reason any army get spears while swords are just a simbol for nobility.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I always find it fascinating the kind of things people will say because they saw a YouTube video once while ignoring all the actual historical context, like the Romans building their empire by fighting spear phalanxes with sword (and javelin) based legions.

      • dwindling7373@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m not an expert, are you? All the in dephts historical weapon stuff I met in my life has told me and confirmed me spears win against swords.

        • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I didn’t say spears didn’t win against swords.

          Spears are easier to wield, it’s a pointy stick. It requires less training to use. Requires significantly less materials to make.

          They are a standoff weapon though, in close combat a sword or small bladed weapon wins. Different tools for different purposes.

          The information I’m parroting is from experts and historians and literature and everything I’ve read over my 4 decades, it’s common knowledge at this point and not really worth “arguing” imo.