I’ve always been told that Hitler was a masterful public speaker; that his support can largely be explained by his compelling, if not mesmerizing hold on crowds. This narrative is not common, it’s universal.

Sometimes I think this is emphasized over how much the crowds approved of the content of his speech.

How do native German speakers feel when they view footage of Hitler? Do you think the reputation is earned?

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think its an important question to delve into if you are an American right now. Some could use with some introspection

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you’re drawing an analogy to Trump, setting aside the many other things that aren’t parallel, Trump is a terrible orator. I mean, most US Presidents are at least decent, but Trump is horrendous.

    • Cris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Edit: I was mistaken that Hitler was elected, thank you to Sem who corrected me below. Hitler ran for office but lost, and was appointed to chancellor by the winner Paul von Hindenburg. When von Hindenberg died a year after Hitler was appointed to chancellor, Hitler succeeded him and abolished the office of president and declared himself Furher und Reichskanzler

      I think it’s pretty important that people are willing to grapple with the fact that people will gladly buy into hatred and fascism when a charismatic populist sells it to them as the ails of their people.

      Hitler was elected*. If we want to avoid the mistakes of the past, we have to be willing to confront the reality of how they happened in the first place. Hitler spoke to real fears and anxieties people had, and promised things they truly wanted, like a great nation they could take national pride in once again.

      • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Hitler was never elected in a fair election. He rose to power first through back room deals, and once he had the power of the state, he used it to influence the next elections and concentrate power.

        • Cris@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Thank you for correcting me, I was mistaken.

          If I understand corectly, he was appointed Chancellor by the Paul Von Hindenberg who won the 1932 election that Hitler had also run in, and rose to power as the successor to von Hindenburg after Hindenburg died in 1934

          I’ve edited my original comment

        • Cris@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Interesting, that wasn’t my understanding, looks like I need to go learn some more about that and see if I was mistaken

          Thanks :)