• RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      They said “a part of” not the sole providers of. Also there is tons of education content on YouTube. I have learned so much from YouTube. It’s actually a really great place to go if you are looking to learn a new skill.

      Maybe that hasn’t been your experience with it but that’s what I use it for the majority of the time.

      • skulkingaround@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        My entire subscription feed is hundreds of edutainment channels pretty much. It’s my alternative to the discovery/history/science channel for the modern age (and tbh it’s higher quality too in many cases)

        It’s also really really good for learning practical skills like home repairs and automotive maintenance.

        Some favorite channels:

        Nilered

        Styropyro

        Practical engineering

        Technology Connections

        Breaking taps

        The thought emporium

      • Siegfried@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I have learned a lot from YT, it’s a really good plataform for that. Languages, programming electronics, and the list goes on… that was my YT experience during the 2010s. But there is also a lot of bs out there, maybe fuled by monetization, extreme groups or just because mankind is stupid at its core, that is purely aimed to diffuse nonsense, catch peoples attention or plainly influence people views.

        Where I live, revisionism is teach at schools as if it is the real thing. “A part” sometimes is enough.

        My comment was originally thought more as a joke than as a real complaint, but in all seriousness, YT has become an extremely good tool both to learn and to influence people. I understand that “regulating it” would be also another double edged sword, but something has to be done.

    • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      There are tons of highly educational YouTube channels, and traditional media has completely abandoned that kind of content. The average YouTube video has more educational content than “The Learning Channel.” And you are more likely to get accurate information about history than “The History Channel”

      This is a boomer take.

      • isles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        What you say is true, but also ignores the alt-right pipelining that YouTube and others are seemingly complicit in, or at the very least is the result of perverse incentives.

        And I’ll say the exact same thing about TikTok. It’s serving as primary sources for many problems around the world, it’s giving more broad and informed, collegiate level discussions of the world, and it’s full of brainrotting limbic hijacking. All true and I don’t think any generation is fully equipped to deal it.

        We can also see historically that banning a “vice” has never effectively removed the vice from society.

        • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes the acquiescence of all editorial and publishing decisions by these tech companies to “the algorithm” (which somehow absolves them of responsibility) is the main culprit there.

          These platforms are more like radio infrastructure or TV infrastructure than any particular channel, and for the most part anything they specifically promote and fund doesn’t tend to be that alt right content which is completely algorithm driven and ad/sponsor/dark money supported.

          We need to employ nuance when discussing these platforms.